Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in People With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
July 1, 2020
Yunxia Ni et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on depression, quality of life, and glycemic control in people with diabetes.

Results Summary

Meta-analysis showed significant improvements in depression, mental health-related quality of life, and HbA1c levels, but no effect on physical health-related quality of life. MBSR and MBCT were concluded to be beneficial complementary treatments for diabetes.

Population

People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
decrease
depression
people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
standardized mean difference -0.84; 95% CI -1.16 to -0.51; p < .0001
showed a significant effect favoring
#1
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
increase
the mental health composite score of QoL
people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
mean difference 7.06; 95% CI 5.09 to 9.03; p < .00001
showed a significant effect favoring
#2
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
decrease
HbA1c
people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
mean difference -0.28; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.09; p = .004
showed a significant effect favoring
#3
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
no change
the physical health composite score of QoL
people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
no significant change
effects on ... have not been found
#4
Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on depression, quality of life (QoL), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in people with diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted. METHODS: Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], Cochrane, PsycINFO, and three Chinese databases) were searched for relevant studies from inception to December 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MBSR and MBCT interventions for people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes were included. FINDINGS: Nine studies described in 11 articles were included in the review. Meta-analysis showed a significant effect favoring MBSR and MBCT on depression (standardized mean difference -0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.16 to -0.51; p < .0001), the mental health composite score of QoL (mean difference [MD] 7.06; 95% CI 5.09 to 9.03; p < .00001), and HbA1c (MD -0.28; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.09; p = .004). However, effects on the physical health composite score of QoL have not been found. CONCLUSIONS: MBSR and MBCT are beneficial in improving depression, the mental health composite score of QoL, and HbA1c in people with diabetes. More well-designed trials using longer follow-up measurements are needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MBSR and MBCT could be considered as effective complementary treatment alternatives for people with diabetes.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansMindfulnessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, PsychologicalTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations28
Citations/Year5.6
Relative Citation Ratio2.42
NIH Percentile79.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.49
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements