Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Protein Supplementation and Resistance Training in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise
October 1, 2020
Matthew R Krull et al. (11 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effects of resistance training with and without protein supplementation on lean body mass and muscle strength among adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Results Summary

The study found that supervised resistance training with protein supplementation was feasible but not more effective at increasing lean body mass or muscle strength than resistance training alone. Both groups showed increases in lean mass and strength over time, but there were no significant differences between the groups.

Population

Adult survivors of childhood cancer aged 18 to <45 years.

Effective Dosage

21 g whey protein per day (90 kcal) for the supplementation group; placebo (sucrose, 90 kcal) for the control group.

Duration

24 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal)
no change
total lean body mass
adult survivors of childhood cancer
-
not more effective at increasing
#1
resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal)
neutral
-
adult survivors of childhood cancer
-
is feasible
#2
resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal)
no change
lean mass
adult survivors of childhood cancer
RT + S, 1.05 ± 2.34 kg; RT + P, 0.13 ± 2.19 kg; P = 0.10
no differences in change
#3
resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal)
no change
strength (grip)
adult survivors of childhood cancer
RT + S, 1.65 ± 4.17 kg; RT + P, 1.63 ± 4.47 kg; P = 0.98
no differences in change
#4
resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal)
no change
strength (mean leg press)
adult survivors of childhood cancer
RT + S, 58.4 ± 78.8 kg; RT + P, 51.0 ± 65.1 kg; P = 0.68
no differences in change
#5
resistance training
increase
lean mass
adult survivors of childhood cancer
P = 0.03
increased
#6
resistance training
increase
strength (grip)
adult survivors of childhood cancer
P = 0.003
increased
#7
resistance training
increase
strength (leg press)
adult survivors of childhood cancer
P < 0.001
increased
#8
Abstract

PURPOSE: Muscle weakness, low lean body mass, and poor physical performance are prevalent among adult survivors of childhood cancer (survivors). We evaluated the feasibility and effects of resistance training with and without protein supplementation on lean body mass and muscle strength among survivors. METHODS: This double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled survivors ≥18 to <45 yr old. Participants were randomized to resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal) (RT + S) or resistance training with placebo (sucrose, 90 kcal) (RT + P). Participants received educational materials, access to a local fitness center, and a tailored resistance training program with tapered supervision. Participant retention and adherence were used to evaluate feasibility. Lean body mass and muscle strength were assessed at baseline and 24 wk, using dual x-ray absorptiometry, and dynamometer testing or one-repetition maximum testing, respectively. Mean changes were compared with two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Of 70 participants randomized, 57 completed the 24-wk intervention (24 in RT + S, 33 in RT + P). The RT + S group completed 74.8% and the RT + P group completed 67.0% of exercise sessions. Mean ± SD age for those who completed was 33.1 ± 7.0 yr, 67% were White and 47% female. There were no differences in change in lean mass (RT + S, 1.05 ± 2.34 kg; RT + P, 0.13 ± 2.19 kg; P = 0.10) or strength (grip RT + S, 1.65 ± 4.17 kg; RT + P, 1.63 ± 4.47 kg; P = 0.98; mean leg press RT + S, 58.4 ± 78.8 kg; RT + P, 51.0 ± 65.1 kg; P = 0.68) between groups. Both lean mass (P = 0.03) and strength (grip P = 0.003, leg press P < 0.001) increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised resistance training among survivors with protein supplementation is feasible but not more effective at increasing total lean body mass than resistance training alone.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCancer SurvivorsDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingWalking SpeedYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year2.0
Relative Citation Ratio0.61
NIH Percentile32.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.31
Normalized Score0.62
Related Supplements
Protein Supplementation and Resistance Training in Childhood... | Panacea Index