Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Changes in vascular calcification and bone mineral density in calcium supplement users from the Canadian Multi-center Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS).

Atherosclerosis
March 1, 2020
Maggie Hulbert et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleMulticenter StudyResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate the relationship between calcium supplement use and the 5-year progression of abdominal aorta calcification (AAC) in older adults.

Results Summary

Calcium supplement use was associated with significantly greater AAC progression over 5 years, particularly in women, and was positively correlated with the amount of calcium consumed. No significant bone mineral density (BMD) preservation was observed in female users, while male users showed greater BMD loss.

Population

Older adults (296 participants: 217 women, 79 men) from one center of the Canadian Multi-Centre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

5 years

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Calcium supplements
increase
cardiovascular events
-
-
have been associated with increased
#1
Calcium supplement use
increase
AAC progression
calcium supplement users, as compared to non-users
-
was significantly greater in
#2
Calcium supplement use
increase
AAC progression
females
-
was significantly greater in
#3
The amount of calcium
increase
AAC progression
-
-
was positively correlated to
#4
Calcium supplement use
increase
AAC progression
women only
-
remained significantly associated with
#5
Calcium supplement use
decrease
BMD loss
males
-
was associated with a significantly greater
#6
Calcium supplement use
no change
BMD preservation
Older female calcium supplement users
-
did not have any significant
#7
Change in AAC score
no change
change in BMD T-Score
-
-
was not associated with
#8
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Calcium supplements have been associated with increased cardiovascular events. This study investigates the relationship between calcium supplement use and the 5 year progression of abdominal aorta calcification (AAC) in participants from one center of the Canadian Multi-Centre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS). METHODS: Participants (n = 296; 217 women and 79 men) had lateral spine X-rays and DEXA bone mineral density (BMD) scans (femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip) taken at two time points within a 5 year interval. AAC was assessed using the Framingham Method. Calcium supplement use was assessed by a facilitated health history questionnaire and medication inventory. RESULTS: AAC significantly increased over 5 years, AAC progression was significantly greater in calcium supplement users, as compared to non-users, overall and in females. The amount of calcium was positively correlated to AAC progression. A multi-variable linear regression model was generated for women only, as there were not enough men for multivariable modelling. Calcium supplement use and amount remained significantly associated with AAC progression after adjustment for age, hypertension, diabetes and smoking history. Change in AAC score was not associated with change in BMD T-Score. In univariate analyses of males, calcium supplement use was associated with a significantly greater BMD loss at the lumbar spine, hip, and femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: Older female calcium supplement users had significantly higher AAC progression over 5 years, but did not have any significant BMD preservation. These results suggest that vascular calcification may contribute to the cardiovascular events observed in calcium supplement users.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Age FactorsAorta, AbdominalBone DensityCalcium, DietaryCanadaCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDietary SupplementsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicObserver VariationOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOverweightProspective StudiesSex CharacteristicsSmokingVascular CalcificationVitamin D
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety30
Efficacy40/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year1.2
Relative Citation Ratio0.46
NIH Percentile25%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.14
Normalized Score0.43
Related Supplements