Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Locomotor Function Following Chronic Stroke, Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, and Brain Injury.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine the most effective interventions to improve walking speed and timed distance in ambulatory individuals more than 6 months after acute-onset CNS injuries like stroke, motor incomplete spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury.
Results Summary
Strong evidence supports walking training at moderate to high intensities or virtual reality-based training for improving walking speed and distance, while body weight-supported treadmill training, robotic-assisted training, or sitting/standing balance training without virtual reality were ineffective. Weak evidence suggests benefits from strength training, circuit training, cycling, or virtual reality-based balance training.
Population
Ambulatory individuals >6 months post-acute-onset CNS injury (stroke, motor incomplete spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury).
Effective Dosage
Not specified (frequency, intensity, time, and type of training interventions were detailed but not quantified).
Duration
Not specified.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
walking training at moderate to high intensities | increase | walking speed or distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | should be offered to improve | #1 |
virtual reality-based training | increase | walking speed or distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | should be offered to improve | #2 |
strength training | increase | walking speed and distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | may improve | #3 |
circuit (ie, combined) training | increase | walking speed and distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | may improve | #4 |
cycling training at moderate to high intensities | increase | walking speed and distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | may improve | #5 |
virtual reality-based balance training | increase | walking speed and distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | may improve | #6 |
body weight-supported treadmill training | no change | walking speed or distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | should not be performed to improve | #7 |
robotic-assisted training | no change | walking speed or distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | should not be performed to improve | #8 |
sitting/standing balance training without virtual reality | no change | walking speed or distance | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | should not be performed to improve | #9 |
task-specific walking training at higher intensities or with augmented feedback | increase | walking speed and distance | those with acute-onset CNS injury | - | should be performed to improve | #10 |
Lower-intensity walking interventions | no change | walking function | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | demonstrated equivocal or limited efficacy | #11 |
impairment-based training strategies | no change | walking function | ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury | - | demonstrated equivocal or limited efficacy | #12 |
BACKGROUND: Individuals with acute-onset central nervous system (CNS) injury, including stroke, motor incomplete spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury, often experience lasting locomotor deficits, as quantified by decreases in gait speed and distance walked over a specific duration (timed distance). The goal of the present clinical practice guideline was to delineate the relative efficacy of various interventions to improve walking speed and timed distance in ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following these specific diagnoses. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published between 1995 and 2016 was performed in 4 databases for randomized controlled clinical trials focused on these specific patient populations, at least 6 months postinjury and with specific outcomes of walking speed and timed distance. For all studies, specific parameters of training interventions including frequency, intensity, time, and type were detailed as possible. Recommendations were determined on the basis of the strength of the evidence and the potential harm, risks, or costs of providing a specific training paradigm, particularly when another intervention may be available and can provide greater benefit. RESULTS: Strong evidence indicates that clinicians should offer walking training at moderate to high intensities or virtual reality-based training to ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury to improve walking speed or distance. In contrast, weak evidence suggests that strength training, circuit (ie, combined) training or cycling training at moderate to high intensities, and virtual reality-based balance training may improve walking speed and distance in these patient groups. Finally, strong evidence suggests that body weight-supported treadmill training, robotic-assisted training, or sitting/standing balance training without virtual reality should not be performed to improve walking speed or distance in ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury to improve walking speed or distance. DISCUSSION: The collective findings suggest that large amounts of task-specific (ie, locomotor) practice may be critical for improvements in walking function, although only at higher cardiovascular intensities or with augmented feedback to increase patient's engagement. Lower-intensity walking interventions or impairment-based training strategies demonstrated equivocal or limited efficacy. LIMITATIONS: As walking speed and distance were primary outcomes, the research participants included in the studies walked without substantial physical assistance. This guideline may not apply to patients with limited ambulatory function, where provision of walking training may require substantial physical assistance. SUMMARY: The guideline suggests that task-specific walking training should be performed to improve walking speed and distance in those with acute-onset CNS injury although only at higher intensities or with augmented feedback. Future studies should clarify the potential utility of specific training parameters that lead to improved walking speed and distance in these populations in both chronic and subacute stages following injury. DISCLAIMER: These recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians to optimize rehabilitation outcomes for persons with chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury to improve walking speed and distance.