Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Lasers in medical science
February 1, 2020
Azamsadat Madani et al. (4 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) versus laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in treating temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

Results Summary

The study compared LLLT and LAT in TMD patients but did not provide specific outcome results in the abstract. The abstract mentions the intervention parameters but lacks detailed efficacy findings.

Population

45 patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

Effective Dosage

810 nm, 200 mW, 30 s per point, Gaussian beam, spot size 0.28 cm.

Duration

Not specified in the abstract.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (16)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
decrease
pain intensity
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly reduced
#1
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
decrease
pain intensity
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly reduced
#2
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
increase
mouth opening
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly increased
#3
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
increase
mouth opening
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly increased
#4
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
decrease
tenderness of masticatory muscles
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly reduced
#5
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
decrease
tenderness of masticatory muscles
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly reduced
#6
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
decrease
tenderness of temporomandibular joints (TMJs)
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly reduced
#7
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
decrease
tenderness of temporomandibular joints (TMJs)
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
significantly reduced
#8
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
no change
pain intensity
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#9
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
no change
pain intensity
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#10
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
no change
mouth opening
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#11
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
no change
mouth opening
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#12
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
no change
tenderness of masticatory muscles
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#13
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
no change
tenderness of masticatory muscles
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#14
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
no change
tenderness of temporomandibular joints (TMJs)
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#15
laser acupuncture therapy (LAT)
no change
tenderness of temporomandibular joints (TMJs)
patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
-
showed no significant difference
#16
Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) versus laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 45 TMD patients were randomly divided into three groups. In group 1 (LLLT), a GaAlAs laser was applied on painful masticatory muscles and TMJs (810 nm, 200 mW, 30 s per point, Gaussian beam, spot size 0.28 cm

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Acupuncture TherapyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLasers, SemiconductorLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMandiblePainRange of Motion, ArticularTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations51
Citations/Year10.2
Relative Citation Ratio7.68
NIH Percentile96.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.70
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements