Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mediterranean-style diet in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (ESTEEM): A pragmatic multicentre randomised trial.

PLoS medicine
July 1, 2019
Bassel H Al Wattar et al. (15 authors)
Journal ArticleMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess whether a Mediterranean-style diet with low to moderate dairy intake could reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk women.

Results Summary

The study found no significant reduction in composite maternal or offspring outcomes with the Mediterranean-style diet, though it noted a potential reduction in gestational diabetes and gestational weight gain. Dairy intake was reduced as part of the intervention, but specific effects of dairy were not isolated.

Population

Inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (obesity, chronic hypertension, or hypertriglyceridaemia).

Effective Dosage

Low to moderate intake of dairy products (exact amounts not specified).

Duration

Intervention administered from 18 to 28 weeks' gestation.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (13)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mediterranean-style diet
increase
nuts
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
70.1% versus 22.9%; aOR 6.8, 95% CI 4.3-10.6, p ≤ 0.001
consumed more
#1
Mediterranean-style diet
increase
extra virgin olive oil
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
93.2% versus 49.0%; aOR 32.2, 95% CI 16.0-64.6, p ≤ 0.001
consumed more
#2
Mediterranean-style diet
increase
fish
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
p < 0.001
increased their intake of
#3
Mediterranean-style diet
increase
white meat
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
p < 0.001
increased their intake of
#4
Mediterranean-style diet
increase
pulses
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
p = 0.05
increased their intake of
#5
Mediterranean-style diet
decrease
red meat
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
p < 0.001
reduced their intake of
#6
Mediterranean-style diet
decrease
butter, margarine, and cream
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
p < 0.001
reduced their intake of
#7
Mediterranean-style diet
no change
composite maternal outcomes
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
22.8% versus 28.6%; aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.03, p = 0.08
no significant reduction in
#8
Mediterranean-style diet
no change
composite offspring outcomes
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
17.3% versus 20.9%; aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.08, p = 0.14
no significant reduction in
#9
Mediterranean-style diet
decrease
gestational diabetes
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
35%; aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91, p = 0.01
apparent reduction in the odds of
#10
Mediterranean-style diet
decrease
gestational weight
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
mean 6.8 versus 8.3 kg; adjusted difference -1.2 Kg, 95% CI -2.2 to -0.2, p = 0.03
gained less
#11
Mediterranean-style diet
no change
any of the other maternal and offspring complications
inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
-
no difference in
#12
Mediterranean-style diet
decrease
gestational diabetes
pregnant women with metabolic risk factors
OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.84, I2 = 0%
significant reduction in
#13
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with metabolic risk factors are at high risk of complications. We aimed to assess whether a Mediterranean-style diet reduces adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk women. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a multicentre randomised trial in 5 maternity units (4 in London and 1 in Birmingham) between 12 September 2014 and 29 February 2016. We randomised inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (obesity, chronic hypertension, or hypertriglyceridaemia) to a Mediterranean-style diet with high intake of nuts, extra virgin olive oil, fruits, vegetables, nonrefined grains, and legumes; moderate to high consumption of fish; low to moderate intake of poultry and dairy products; low intake of red and processed meat; and avoidance of sugary drinks, fast food, and food rich in animal fat versus usual care. Participants received individualised dietary advice at 18, 20, and 28 weeks' gestation. The primary endpoints were composite maternal (gestational diabetes or preeclampsia) and composite offspring (stillbirth, small for gestational age, or admission to neonatal care unit) outcomes prioritised by a Delphi survey. We used an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with multivariable models and identified the stratification variables and prognostic factors a priori. We screened 7,950 and randomised 1,252 women. Baseline data were available for 593 women in the intervention (93.3% follow-up, 553/593) and 612 in the control (95.6% follow-up, 585/612) groups. Over a quarter of randomised women were primigravida (330/1,205; 27%), 60% (729/1,205) were of Black or Asian ethnicity, and 69% (836/1,205) were obese. Women in the intervention arm consumed more nuts (70.1% versus 22.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3-10.6, p ≤ 0.001) and extra virgin olive oil (93.2% versus 49.0%; aOR 32.2, 95% CI 16.0-64.6, p ≤ 0.001) than controls; increased their intake of fish (p < 0.001), white meat (p < 0.001), and pulses (p = 0.05); and reduced their intake of red meat (p < 0.001), butter, margarine, and cream (p < 0.001). There was no significant reduction in the composite maternal (22.8% versus 28.6%; aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.03, p = 0.08) or composite offspring (17.3% versus 20.9%; aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.08, p = 0.14) outcomes. There was an apparent reduction in the odds of gestational diabetes by 35% (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91, p = 0.01) but not in other individual components of the composite outcomes. Mothers gained less gestational weight (mean 6.8 versus 8.3 kg; adjusted difference -1.2 Kg, 95% CI -2.2 to -0.2, p = 0.03) with intervention versus control. There was no difference in any of the other maternal and offspring complications between both groups. When we pooled findings from the Effect of Simple, Targeted Diet in Pregnant Women With Metabolic Risk Factors on Pregnancy Outcomes (ESTEEM) trial with similar trials using random effects meta-analysis, we observed a significant reduction in gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.84, I2 = 0%), with no heterogeneity (2 trials, 2,397 women). The study's limitations include the use of participant reported tools for adherence to the intervention instead of objective biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, individualised, Mediterranean-style diet in pregnancy did not reduce the overall risk of adverse maternal and offspring complications but has the potential to reduce gestational weight gain and the risk of gestational diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02218931.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultDelphi TechniqueDiabetes, GestationalDiet, HealthyDiet, MediterraneanEnergy MetabolismEnglandFemaleGestational Weight GainHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMeta-Analysis as TopicNutritional StatusNutritive ValuePregnancyProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy50/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations114
Citations/Year19.0
Relative Citation Ratio7.82
NIH Percentile96.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.67
Normalized Score0.57
Related Supplements