Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Low-Fat Diet Designed for Weight Loss But Not Weight Maintenance Improves Nitric Oxide-Dependent Arteriolar Vasodilation in Obese Adults.

Nutrients
June 14, 2019
Abeer M Mahmoud et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether a low-fat diet designed for weight loss (LFWL) improves microvascular function, specifically nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation, compared to a low-fat weight maintenance (LFWM) diet, independent of weight loss.

Results Summary

The LFWL diet improved flow-induced and acetylcholine-induced dilation in microvessels, with the effect being inhibited by L-NAME, indicating increased vascular nitric oxide contribution. The LFWM diet had no effect on microvascular reactivity. Neither diet altered serum nitric oxide or C-reactive protein levels.

Population

Obese adults (n = 21, with 11 in LFWL and 10 in LFWM groups).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Six weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (15)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
low-fat diet
increase
cardiovascular risk
-
-
improves
#1
low-fat diets designed for weight loss (LFWL)
increase
nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation in microvessels
Obese adults
-
improved
#2
LFWL diet
increase
flow-induced dilation (FID)
Obese adults
-
increased
#3
LFWL diet
increase
ACh-induced dilation (AChID)
Obese adults
-
increased
#4
L-NAME
decrease
effect of LFWL diet on flow-induced and ACh-induced dilation
Obese adults
-
inhibited
#5
low-fat weight maintenance (LFWM) diet
no change
FID or AChID
Obese adults
-
did not affect
#6
Indomethacin
increase
FID and AChID
Obese adults
-
improved
#7
both diets (LFWL and LFWM)
decrease
effect of indomethacin on FID and AChID
Obese adults
-
minimized
#8
LFWL diet
no change
Serum NO
Obese adults
-
did not change
#9
LFWM diet
no change
Serum NO
Obese adults
-
did not change
#10
LFWL diet
no change
Serum CRP
Obese adults
-
did not change
#11
LFWM diet
no change
Serum CRP
Obese adults
-
did not change
#12
LFWL diet
increase
microvascular reactivity
Obese adults
-
improves
#13
LFWL diet
increase
vascular NO contribution to the improved microvascular dilation
Obese adults
-
increased
#14
weight reduction on low fat diet
increase
microvascular health
-
-
is critical for
#15
Abstract

Obesity is associated with microvascular dysfunction. While low-fat diet improves cardiovascular risk, its contributions on microvascular function, independent of weight loss, is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation in microvessels is improved by low-fat diets designed for weight loss (LFWL) compared to low-fat weight maintenance (LFWM) diet. Obese adults were randomly assigned to either a LFWL diet (n = 11) or LFWM diet (n = 10) for six weeks. Microvessels were obtained from gluteal subcutaneous fat biopsies before and after the intervention for vascular reactivity measurements to acetylcholine (Ach) and flow, with and without L-NAME or indomethacin. Vascular and serum NO and C-reactive protein (CRP) were also measured. LFWL diet increased flow-induced (FID) and ACh-induced dilation (AChID); an effect that was inhibited by L-NAME. Conversely, LFWM diet did not affect FID or AChID. Indomethacin improved FID and AChID in the baseline and this effect was minimized in response to both diets. Serum NO or CRP did not change in response to either diet. In conclusion, LFWL diet improves microvascular reactivity compared to LFWM diet and increased vascular NO contribution to the improved microvascular dilation. These data suggest that weight reduction on low fat diet is critical for microvascular health.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdolescentAdultBody Weight MaintenanceDiet, Fat-RestrictedFemaleHumansMaleMicrovesselsMiddle AgedNitric OxideObesitySubcutaneous FatVasodilationWeight LossYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations13
Citations/Year2.2
Relative Citation Ratio0.78
NIH Percentile41%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score2.12
Normalized Score0.69
Related Supplements