Feasibility of a group-based laughter yoga intervention as an adjunctive treatment for residual symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress in people with depression.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential efficacy of Laughter Yoga (LY) for improving residual mood, anxiety, and stress symptoms in adults diagnosed with depression.
Results Summary
The LY group showed statistically greater decreases in depression and improvements in mental health-related quality of life compared to the control group immediately post-intervention. Participants reported high satisfaction with the intervention, though qualitative feedback suggested some aspects required modification.
Population
Working-aged adults with a clinical diagnosis of depression.
Effective Dosage
Eight sessions over four weeks.
Duration
Four weeks (with follow-up at three months).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laughter Yoga (LY) | decrease | depressive symptoms | - | - | reduces | #1 |
Laughter Yoga (LY) | decrease | depression | adults diagnosed with depression | - | had statistically greater decreases in | #2 |
Laughter Yoga (LY) | increase | mental health related quality of life | adults diagnosed with depression | - | improvements in | #3 |
Laughter Yoga (LY) | increase | depression | - | - | may be effective to improve | #4 |
Laughter Yoga (LY) | increase | mental health related quality of life | - | - | may be effective to improve | #5 |
BACKGROUND: Laughter Yoga (LY) is a group-based intervention involving simulated laughter, gentle stretching, rhythmic breathing and meditation. There is some limited evidence that LY reduces depressive symptoms over the short term. However, the quality of previous LY studies is poor and none involved working-aged people with a clinical diagnosis of depression. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential efficacy of LY for improving residual mood, anxiety and stress symptoms in adults diagnosed with depression. METHODS: Fifty participants were randomised to the group LY intervention (n = 23) consisting of eight sessions over four weeks, or treatment-as-usual (n = 27). Participants completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale and the Short Form 12 item Health Survey at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and at 3 months follow-up (T2). LY participants also completed a Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ8) at T1 and eleven participated in individual qualitative interviews at T2. RESULTS: The LY group had statistically greater decreases in depression and improvements in mental health related quality of life compared to the control group from T0 to T1. The CSQ8 scores indicated a favourable level of satisfaction with the LY intervention. The qualitative interviews highlighted aspects of the intervention that were effective and those requiring modification. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the small sample size and treatment-as-usual control group. CONCLUSIONS: A full scale RCT of LY could be feasible if some modifications were made to the protocol/intervention. The intervention may be effective to improve depression and mental health related quality of life immediately post intervention.