Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The efficacy of a brief app-based mindfulness intervention on psychosocial outcomes in healthy adults: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

PloS one
January 1, 2018
Louise Champion et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether mindfulness training delivered via a smartphone app (Headspace) could improve psychosocial well-being (satisfaction with life, stress, and resilience) in adults from the general population.

Results Summary

The mindfulness app significantly improved self-reported satisfaction with life, stress, and resilience compared to the control group, with effects observed at 10 days and further improvements at 30 days. The app also protected against increased perceived stress in the control group, and participants who found the app easy to engage with reported the largest benefits.

Population

Adults from the general population

Effective Dosage

10 or 30 days of self-guided use (specific daily duration not mentioned)

Duration

30 days

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness meditation (MM) app 'Headspace'
increase
self-reported satisfaction with life
adults from the general population
Cohen's d = 0.57
positively impacted
#1
mindfulness meditation (MM) app 'Headspace'
decrease
stress
adults from the general population
Cohen's d = 1.42
positively impacted
#2
mindfulness meditation (MM) app 'Headspace'
increase
resilience
adults from the general population
Cohen's d = 0.63
positively impacted
#3
mindfulness meditation (MM) app 'Headspace'
no change
perceived stress
adults from the general population
-
was able to protect against
#4
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence suggests that mindfulness training may improve aspects of psychosocial well-being. Whilst mindfulness is traditionally taught in person, consumers are increasingly turning to mindfulness-based smartphone apps as an alternative delivery medium for training. Despite this growing trend, few studies have explored whether mindfulness delivered via a smartphone app can enhance psychosocial well-being within the general public. METHODS: The present pilot randomised controlled trial compared the impact of engaging with the self-guided mindfulness meditation (MM) app 'Headspace' (n = 38) for a period of 10 or 30 days, to a wait-list (WL) control (n = 36), using a cohort of adults from the general population. The Satisfaction with Life Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and Wagnild Resilience Scale were administered online at baseline and after 10 and 30 days of the intervention. RESULTS: Twelve participants (MM n = 9, WL n = 3) were lost to follow-up for unknown reasons. Relative to the WL control, the MM app positively impacted self-reported satisfaction with life, stress, and resilience at day 10, with further improvements emerging at day 30 (Cohen's d = 0.57, 1.42, 0.63 respectively). The rate of improvement was largest at the 10-day assessment point, dropping moderately by day 30. Participants that rated the MM app as easy to engage with experienced the largest self-reported benefits. Moreover, the MM app was able to protect against an unexpected increase in perceived stress that emerged in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot randomised controlled trial shows that self-reported improvements in psychosocial outcomes can be achieved at low cost through short-term engagement with a mindfulness-based smartphone app, and should be followed up with more substantive studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN34618894.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultCell PhoneDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMeditationMental HealthMiddle AgedMindfulnessMobile ApplicationsPatient CarePersonal SatisfactionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnaires
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations87
Citations/Year12.4
Relative Citation Ratio6.40
NIH Percentile95.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.18
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements