Switch to low-fat diet improves outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in obese mice.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether switching obese mice to a low-fat diet could improve survival outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) when combined with chemotherapy.
Results Summary
Switching obese mice to a low-fat diet prior to vincristine treatment significantly improved survival (92%) compared to obese mice on a high-fat diet (17%) and control mice on a low-fat diet (42%). However, the dietary switch did not improve survival with other chemotherapy drugs like dexamethasone or l-asparaginase.
Population
Diet-induced obese (DIO) mice and control mice implanted with syngeneic ALL cells, as well as human ALL xenografts.
Effective Dosage
Not specified (diet composition: 10% low-fat diet vs. 60% high-fat diet).
Duration
Not specified (intervention occurred prior to chemotherapy initiation).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
diet-induced obesity (60% calories from fat diet) | decrease | survival from ALL after vincristine monotherapy | DIO mice | 17% | had poorer survival | #1 |
control diet (10% low fat diet) | increase | survival from ALL after vincristine monotherapy | control mice | 42% | had better survival | #2 |
switching obese mice to low-fat diet prior to vincristine | increase | survival from ALL | obese mice | 92% | led to dramatically improved survival | #3 |
FBS restriction (5% vs 10%) | increase | sensitivity to vincristine | murine and human ALL cells | - | made more sensitive | #4 |
serum restriction | increase | sensitivity to dexamethasone and l-asparaginase | ALL cells | - | enhanced sensitivity | #5 |
dietary switch | no change | survival of DIO mice treated with dexamethasone or l-asparaginase monotherapy | DIO mice | - | did not improve survival | #6 |
dietary intervention | increase | ALL cell sensitivity to vincristine in vivo | - | - | has a unique effect to improve sensitivity | #7 |
dietary intervention | increase | ALL outcome | preclinical model | - | can improve outcome | #8 |
BACKGROUND: It is becoming increasingly recognized that weight and nutritional status can impact cancer survival. We have previously shown that obese mice with syngeneic acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have poorer response to chemotherapy treatment than control mice. We therefore investigated whether dietary intervention could improve outcome from the most common pediatric cancer, ALL. METHODS: Diet-induced obese (DIO) mice raised on a 60% calories from fat diet and control mice were implanted with syngeneic ALL cells. Some DIO mice were switched to the low-fat control diet. Survival from ALL was assessed without or with chemotherapy treatment starting at the time of the diet switch. Cells from DIO mice before and after diet switch were assessed by FACS for BrdU incorporation and phosphorylation status of AKT, S6K, and EIF2a. Similar experiments were done with human ALL xenografts. Mouse and human ALL cells were cultured in media with 10% or 5% fetal bovine serum, and sensitivity to chemotherapies assessed. RESULTS: DIO mice had poorer survival (17%) after vincristine monotherapy than control mice on a 10% low fat diet (42%; n = 12/group; p = 0.09, log rank). However, switching obese mice to the low-fat diet prior to initiation of vincristine led to dramatically improved survival (92%, p < 0.01 vs both other groups). In vitro, FBS restriction made murine and human ALL cells more sensitive to vincristine. Interestingly, while serum restriction enhanced ALL sensitivity to dexamethasone and l-asparaginase, dietary switch did not improve survival of DIO mice treated with either drug in monotherapy. Thus, it appears that dietary intervention has a unique effect to improve ALL cell sensitivity to vincristine in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: We report herein that a dietary intervention can improve ALL outcome in a preclinical model. Further work is needed to identify the mechanisms of this effect and investigate potential impact on human leukemia in patients.