Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The effectiveness of backward walking as a treatment for people with gait impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical rehabilitation
February 1, 2019
Tharani Balasukumaran et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

To investigate the effectiveness of backward walking in treating gait impairments related to neurological and musculoskeletal disorders.

Results Summary

Backward walking combined with conventional physiotherapy significantly reduced pain and functional disability and improved quadriceps strength in knee osteoarthritis patients. It also improved balance and stability in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and gait parameters and muscle strength in anterior cruciate ligament injury, but no significant benefits were found for other conditions.

Population

People with gait impairments related to neurological and musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., knee osteoarthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, anterior cruciate ligament injury).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

2 to 4 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
backward walking with conventional physiotherapy treatment
decrease
pain
patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis
-0.87
significant standardized mean difference values in favour
#1
backward walking with conventional physiotherapy treatment
decrease
functional disability
patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis
-1.19
significant standardized mean difference values in favour
#2
backward walking with conventional physiotherapy treatment
increase
quadriceps strength
patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis
1.22
significant standardized mean difference values in favour
#3
backward walking
increase
balance and stability
cases of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
-
improved significantly
#4
backward walking
increase
gait parameters and muscle strength
anterior cruciate ligament injury
-
improved significantly
#5
backward walking
no change
-
any of the other conditions
-
no significant evidence in favour
#6
Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To investigate the effectiveness of backward walking in the treatment of people with gait impairments related to neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. DESIGN:: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized control studies. DATA SOURCES:: Searched from the date of inception to March 2018, and included PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PEDro, CINAHL, and the MEDLINE databases. METHODS:: Investigating the effects of backward walking on pain, functional disability, muscle strength, gait parameters, balance, stability, and plantar pressure in people with gait impairments. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality. Similar outcomes were pooled by calculating the standardized mean difference. RESULTS:: Of the 21 studies (neurological 11 and musculoskeletal 10), 635 participants were included. The average PEDro score was 5.4/10. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant standardized mean difference values in favour of backward walking, with conventional physiotherapy treatment for two to four weeks to reduce pain (-0.87) and functional disability (-1.19) and to improve quadriceps strength (1.22) in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. The balance and stability in cases of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and gait parameters and muscle strength in anterior cruciate ligament injury improved significantly when backward walking was included as an exercise. There was no significant evidence in favour of backward walking in any of the other conditions. CONCLUSION:: The systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that backward walking with conventional physiotherapy treatment is effective and clinically worthwhile in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Insufficient evidence was available for the remaining gait impairment conditions and no conclusions could be drawn.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Exercise TherapyGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMuscle StrengthMusculoskeletal Diseases
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations16
Citations/Year2.7
Relative Citation Ratio1.37
NIH Percentile61.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.24
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements