Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The effects of chronic betaine supplementation on body composition and performance in collegiate females: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
January 1, 1970
Jason Michael Cholewa et al. (8 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate whether betaine supplementation enhances body composition or performance in untrained young women undergoing resistance training.

Results Summary

Betaine supplementation led to greater reductions in body fat percentage and fat mass compared to placebo, but did not significantly improve absolute strength or other performance metrics. A trend toward increased weekly training volume was observed in the betaine group.

Population

Untrained young women (21.0 ± 1.4 years, 165.9 ± 6.4 cm, 68.6 ± 11.8 kg).

Effective Dosage

2.5 g/day

Duration

8 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (14)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
betaine supplementation
increase
body composition
young men
-
improve
#1
betaine supplementation
increase
some metrics of muscular performance
young men
-
improve
#2
resistance training
increase
lean mass
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
2.4 ± 1.8 kg
significant main effects of time were found for changes in
#3
resistance training
increase
muscle thickness
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
0.13 ± 0.08 cm
significant main effects of time were found for changes in
#4
resistance training
increase
vertical jump
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
1.8 ± 1.6 cm
significant main effects of time were found for changes in
#5
resistance training
increase
squat 1RM
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
39.8 ± 14.0 kg
significant main effects of time were found for changes in
#6
resistance training
increase
bench press 1 RM
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
9.1 ± 7.3 kg
significant main effects of time were found for changes in
#7
betaine supplementation
increase
weekly training volumes
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
-
trend was found for greater
#8
betaine supplementation
decrease
body fat percentage
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
- 3.3 ± 1.7%
decreased significantly more in betaine compared to placebo
#9
betaine supplementation
decrease
fat mass
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
- 2.0 ± 1.1 kg
decreased significantly more in betaine compared to placebo
#10
placebo
decrease
body fat percentage
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
- 1.7 ± 1.6%
decreased
#11
placebo
decrease
fat mass
young women without prior structured resistance training experience
- 0.8 ± 1.3 kg
decreased
#12
betaine supplementation
decrease
fat mass
untrained collegiate females
-
may enhance reductions in
#13
betaine supplementation
no change
absolute strength
untrained collegiate females
-
not
#14
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Betaine supplementation has been shown to improve body composition and some metrics of muscular performance in young men; but, whether betaine enhances body composition or performance in female subjects is currently unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction between resistance training adaptation and chronic betaine supplementation in females. METHODS: Twenty-three young women (21.0 ± 1.4 years, 165.9 ± 6.4 cm, 68.6 ± 11.8 kg) without prior structured resistance training experience volunteered for this study. Body composition (BodPod), rectus femoris muscle thickness (B-mode Ultrasound), vertical jump, back squat 1RM and bench press 1RM were assessed pre- and post-training. Following 1 week of familiarization training, subjects were matched for body composition and squat strength, and randomly assigned to either a betaine (2.5 g/day; n = 11) or placebo (n = 12) group that completed 3 sets of 6-7 exercises per day performed to momentary muscular failure. Training was divided into two lower and one upper body training sessions per week performed on non-consecutive days for 8 weeks, and weekly volume load was used to analyze work capacity. RESULTS: Significant main effects of time were found for changes in lean mass (2.4 ± 1.8 kg), muscle thickness (0.13 ± 0.08 cm), vertical jump (1.8 ± 1.6 cm), squat 1RM (39.8 ± 14.0 kg), and bench press 1 RM (9.1 ± 7.3 kg); however, there were no significant interactions. A trend (p = .056) was found for greater weekly training volumes for betaine versus placebo. Significant interactions were found for changes in body fat percentage and fat mass: body fat percentage and fat mass decreased significantly more in betaine (- 3.3 ± 1.7%; - 2.0 ± 1.1 kg) compared to placebo (- 1.7 ± 1.6%; - 0.8 ± 1.3 kg), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that betaine supplementation may enhance reductions in fat mass, but not absolute strength, that accompany a resistance training program in untrained collegiate females.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Adaptation, PhysiologicalBetaineBody CompositionDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMuscle StrengthMuscle, SkeletalResistance TrainingSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations34
Citations/Year4.9
Relative Citation Ratio2.32
NIH Percentile78.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.81
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements