Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A review of vitamin D insufficiency and its management: a lack of evidence and consensus persists.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians
January 1, 1970
S Gorey et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the benefits and uncertainties of vitamin D supplementation, particularly its role in calcium homeostasis and its effects on falls and fractures in older people.

Results Summary

The study found mixed signals regarding vitamin D supplementation but overall evidence of benefit for those with risk factors for deficiency, recommending a daily dose of 800-1000 IU to achieve target levels of >25 to >80 nmol/l, while advising against large bolus doses.

Population

Older people, particularly those with risk factors for vitamin D deficiency.

Effective Dosage

800-1000 IU daily

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
vitamin D supplementation
increase
falls and fractures
older people
-
has been linked to
#1
vitamin D supplementation
increase
-
those with risk factors for deficiency
-
evidence of benefit
#2
daily dose of 800-1000 IU
increase
vitamin D target levels of >25 to >80 nmol/l
-
-
best achieved by
#3
Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency worldwide, however uncertainty persists regarding the benefits of vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D is essential for calcium homeostasis, and has been linked to falls and fractures in older people. There are numerous risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, chief among them old age. Studies of vitamin D supplementation have given mixed signals, but over all there is evidence of benefit for those with risk factors for deficiency. International guidelines recommend vitamin D target levels of >25 to >80 nmol/l, best achieved by a daily dose of 800-1000 IU. Large bolus doses should be avoided. There are still unanswered questions regarding vitamin D supplementation and target levels. There is need for well designed and powered trials to achieve consensus.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Accidental FallsAgingConsensusDietary SupplementsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations5
Citations/Year0.8
Relative Citation Ratio0.39
NIH Percentile21.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.57
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements