Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.

Prosthetics and orthotics international
October 1, 2018
Kevin De Pauw et al. (5 authors)
Controlled Clinical TrialJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 4.0 during walking at different speeds in transtibial and transfemoral amputees compared to able-bodied individuals.

Results Summary

The study found that walking with the novel prosthetic device significantly increased heart rate and perceived exertion levels in amputees compared to current prostheses, particularly in transfemoral amputees. However, subjective measures highlighted the importance of the technology despite the higher effort required.

Population

Six able-bodied subjects, six unilateral transtibial amputees, and six unilateral transfemoral amputees.

Effective Dosage

Not applicable

Duration

6-minute walk test at normal speed, followed by 2-minute walking tests at slow, normal, and fast speeds.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 4.0
increase
heart rate
transfemoral amputees and transtibial
-
significantly increased
#1
Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 4.0
increase
rating of perceived exertion levels
transfemoral amputees
-
significantly higher
#2
Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 4.0
increase
intensity of effort during walking
-
-
higher
#3
current prostheses
increase
rating of perceived exertion levels
transtibial and transfemoral amputees
-
significantly elevated
#4
current prostheses
increase
heart rate
transfemoral amputees
-
significantly elevated
#5
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel prosthetic device during walking is an important step in product development. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of a novel quasi-passive ankle prosthetic device, Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 4.0, during walking at different speeds, using physiological determinants in transtibial and transfemoral amputees. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized crossover design for amputees. METHODS: Six able-bodied subjects, six unilateral transtibial amputees, and six unilateral transfemoral amputees underwent a 6-min walk test at normal speed, followed by series of 2-min walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds. The intensity of effort and subjective measures were determined. Amputees performed all walking tests on a treadmill with current and novel prostheses. Shapiro-Wilk normality tests and parametric and nonparametric tests were conducted (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Compared to able-bodied individuals, the rating of perceived exertion levels were significantly elevated in transtibial and transfemoral amputees for both prostheses (p ≤ 0.016). Compared to able-bodied individuals transfemoral amputees also showed significantly elevated heart rate for both prostheses at normal speed (p ≤ 0.043). Within-group comparisons demonstrated that walking with Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot significantly increased the heart rate in transfemoral amputees and transtibial compared to current prosthesis (p = 0.002). Furthermore, transfemoral amputees reached a significantly higher rating of perceived exertion levels. CONCLUSION: Intensity of effort during walking with Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot is higher compared to current prostheses. Clinical relevance Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 4.0 is a novel quasi-passive ankle prosthesis with state-of-the-art technological parts. Subjective measures show the importance of this technology, but the intensity of effort during walking still remains higher compared to current passive prostheses, especially in transfemoral amputees.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedAmputation, SurgicalAnkleArtificial LimbsCross-Over StudiesFemaleFootHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthotic DevicesPhysical ExertionProsthesis DesignSpirometryWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year1.4
Relative Citation Ratio1.05
NIH Percentile51.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.94
Normalized Score0.61
Related Supplements
The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototyp... | Panacea Index