Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effect of continuous progressive resistance training during hemodialysis on body composition, physical function and quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Clinical rehabilitation
July 1, 2018
Clara Suemi da Costa Rosa et al. (8 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the effect of progressive resistance training on functional capacity, including walking capacity, in end-stage renal disease patients.

Results Summary

The study found no significant difference in walking capacity (6-minute walk test) between the progressive resistance training group and the control group. Other measures like leg strength and flexibility improved, but walking performance remained unchanged.

Population

52 hemodialysis patients (aged 55.7 ± 14.03 years)

Effective Dosage

Two sets of 15-20 repetitions, thrice a week

Duration

12 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
progressive resistance training (PRT)
increase
leg lean mass
hemodialysis patients
effect size (ES) of 0.56
significantly improved
#1
progressive resistance training (PRT)
increase
bone mineral content
hemodialysis patients
effect size (ES) of 0.65
significantly improved
#2
progressive resistance training (PRT)
increase
leg strength in STT repetitions
hemodialysis patients
effect size (ES) of 0.66
significantly improved
#3
progressive resistance training (PRT)
increase
flexibility
hemodialysis patients
effect size (ES) of 1.03
significantly improved
#4
progressive resistance training (PRT)
no change
walking capacity
hemodialysis patients
-
were not different
#5
progressive resistance training (PRT)
no change
handgrip strength (HGS)
hemodialysis patients
-
were not different
#6
progressive resistance training (PRT)
no change
quality of life (QoL)
hemodialysis patients
-
were not different
#7
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of continuous progressive resistance training on body composition, functional capacity and self-reported quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: The study included 52 hemodialysis patients (aged 55.7 ± 14.03 years) randomized into exercise (progressive resistance training (PRT), n = 28) or control (CON, n = 24) groups. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized into the PRT group received prescribed strength exercises in two sets of 15-20 repetitions, in a repetition maximum training zone regime, thrice a week for 12 weeks, during hemodialysis. Patients randomized into the CON group received a sham-exercise with active mobilization of the arms and legs without load and progression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), strength using handgrip dynamometry (HGS), repeated sit-to-stand test (STT), 6-minute walk test, flexibility and the SF-36 questionnaire (quality of life (QoL)) were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Leg lean mass ( P = 0.04, effect size (ES) of 0.56), bone mineral content ( P = 0.02, ES of 0.65), leg strength in STT repetitions ( P = 0.01, ES of 0.66) and flexibility ( P < 0.01, ES of 1.03) were significantly improved in the PRT group compared to the CON group. Walking capacity, HGS and QoL were not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: 12 weeks of PRT with a repetition maximum training zone regime provided significant load to increase leg lean mass and STT performance as well as bone mineral content, compared to the CON, which continued to deteriorate. There was lack of efficacy on walking test, HGS and QoL.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Absorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody CompositionExercise TestFemaleHand StrengthHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRenal DialysisResistance Training
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy30/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations42
Citations/Year6.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.98
NIH Percentile84.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score15.54
Normalized Score0.49
Related Supplements