Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Comparison of Oral Iron Supplement Formulations for Normalization of Iron Status Following Roux-EN-y Gastric Bypass Surgery: a Randomized Trial.

Obesity surgery
February 1, 2018
Renee A Mischler et al. (8 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of oral iron supplementation using non-heme versus heme iron for treating iron deficiency in women who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Results Summary

The study found that oral supplementation with FeSO (non-heme iron) was effective in treating iron deficiency in post-RYGB patients, though specific comparative results between non-heme and heme iron were not fully detailed in the abstract.

Population

Women post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery with iron deficiency.

Effective Dosage

Not specified in the abstract.

Duration

Not specified in the abstract.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
non-heme iron (FeSO4)
increase
serum ferritin
women post-RYGB and iron deficient
from 15.6 ± 9.8 ng/mL to 25.8 ± 15.8 ng/mL
significantly increased
#1
non-heme iron (FeSO4)
increase
hemoglobin
women post-RYGB and iron deficient
from 12.1 ± 0.8 g/dL to 12.8 ± 0.9 g/dL
significantly increased
#2
heme iron (proferrin)
no change
serum ferritin
women post-RYGB and iron deficient
from 15.6 ± 9.8 ng/mL to 17.8 ± 11.8 ng/mL
did not significantly change
#3
heme iron (proferrin)
no change
hemoglobin
women post-RYGB and iron deficient
from 12.1 ± 0.8 g/dL to 12.4 ± 0.9 g/dL
did not significantly change
#4
non-heme iron (FeSO4)
decrease
iron deficiency
women post-RYGB and iron deficient
-
was more effective than
#5
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence behind recommendations for treatment of iron deficiency (ID) following roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) lacks high quality studies. SETTING: Academic, United States OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of oral iron supplementation using non-heme versus heme iron for treatment of iron deficiency in RYGB patients. METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind study, women post-RYGB and iron deficient received non-heme iron (FeSO RESULTS: At baseline, the mean ± standard deviation for age, BMI, and years since surgery of the sample was 41.5 ± 6.8 years, 34.4 ± 5.9 kg/m CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with recommendations, oral supplementation using FeSO

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Administration, OralAdultAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDietary SupplementsDosage FormsFemaleGastric BypassHumansIronIron DeficienciesMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsSingle-Blind Method
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations21
Citations/Year3.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.15
NIH Percentile55.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.22
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Comparison of Oral Iron Supplement Formulations for Normaliz... | Panacea Index