Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Update on Cardiovascular Effects of Older and Newer Anti-diabetic Medications.

Current medicinal chemistry
January 1, 2018
Ioanna Eleftheriadou et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Extracted Claims (14)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
metformin
decrease
CV safety
patients with type 2 diabetes
-
seems to have cardio-protective effects
#1
empagliflozin
decrease
CV safety
patients with CV disease
-
seem reasonable options
#2
liraglutide
decrease
CV safety
patients with CV disease
-
seem reasonable options
#3
semaglutide
decrease
CV safety
patients with CV disease
-
seem reasonable options
#4
sulfonylureas
neutral
CV safety
patients with CV disease
-
should be avoided
#5
gliclazide
neutral
CV safety
patients with CV disease
-
with the exception of
#6
saxagliptin
no change
CV outcomes
-
-
have neutral effects
#7
alogliptin
no change
CV outcomes
-
-
have neutral effects
#8
sitagliptin
no change
CV outcomes
-
-
have neutral effects
#9
lixisenatide
no change
CV outcomes
-
-
have neutral effects
#10
pioglitazone
decrease
CV outcomes
-
-
may have some CV benefits
#11
saxagliptin
neutral
-
patients with heart failure
-
should be avoided
#12
alogliptin
neutral
-
patients with heart failure
-
should be avoided
#13
pioglitazone
neutral
-
patients with heart failure
-
is contraindicated
#14
Abstract

It is known that Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Over the last years, one of the most discussed topics is the CV safety of anti-diabetic medications. Regarding CV safety of older antidiabetic agents the data are less clear and conclusions about their CV safety are mostly based on randomized controlled trials designed to assess their glucose lowering efficacy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the CV safety of older and newer antidiabetic medications. According to the published literature metformin is the first line agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and seems to have cardio-protective effects. The choice of the second line agent when metformin monotherapy fails to achieve HbA1c targets is less clear. In the light of the findings of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and the recently published LEADER and SUSTAIN 6 trials, empagliflozin, liraglutide and semaglutide seem reasonable options as second line agents for patients with CV disease. Sulfonylureas on the other hand, with the exception of gliclazide, should be avoided in those patients, although CV safety trials are still lacking. In individuals without CV disease any of the other classes of anti-diabetic medication can be selected on a patient-centered approach. Saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin and lixisenatide have been evaluated in CV safety trials and have neutral effects on CV outcomes, while pioglitazone may have some CV benefits. Saxagliptin and alogliptin, however, should be avoided in patients with heart failure, while pioglitazone is contraindicated in this population.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Benzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlucosidesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinLiraglutideMetforminPioglitazoneSodium-Glucose Transporter 2
Study Links
PubMed ID28554326
Related Supplements