Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Blood flow restriction walking and physical function in older adults: A randomized control trial.

Journal of science and medicine in sport
December 1, 2017
Matthew John Clarkson et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to examine the effect of adding blood flow restriction to low-intensity walking on clinical measures of physical function in older adults.

Results Summary

Blood flow restriction walking (BFRW) resulted in 2.5-4.5 fold greater improvements in physical function measures compared to the control group, though perceived exertion was higher for BFRW. The study concluded that BFRW enhances the quality of walking exercise for populations contraindicated for heavy-load resistance training.

Population

Sedentary older men and women

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

6 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
low-intensity blood flow restriction walking
increase
all measures of physical function
sedentary older men and women
2.5-4.5 fold greater improvement
typically resulted in a 2.5-4.5 fold greater improvement in performance
#1
low-intensity blood flow restriction walking
increase
rating of perceived exertion (RPE)
sedentary older men and women
-
was greater
#2
low-intensity blood flow restriction walking
decrease
rating of perceived exertion (RPE)
sedentary older men and women
-
declining across the study
#3
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The progressive age-related declines in muscle health and physical function in older adults are related to muscle size and strength. Walking with an applied blood flow restriction is an alternative to maintain muscle volume in older adults to increase the value for time spent walking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of adding blood flow restriction to low-intensity walking on clinical measures of physical function. DESIGN/METHODS: Sedentary older men and women were randomised to either a low-intensity blood flow restriction walking group (BFRW; n=10), or a non-blood flow restriction walking control group (CON; n=9). Participants were assessed at baseline, three-weeks and six-weeks for the 30second sit to stand, six-minute walk test, timed up and go, and a modified Queen's College step test. While a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for training sessions at baseline, three-weeks and six-weeks. RESULTS: BFRW typically resulted in a 2.5-4.5 fold greater improvement in performance on all measures of physical function compared with CON among these older adults. However, RPE was greater for BFRW at all time points (for baseline, three-weeks, six-weeks: 14±0; 11±0; 11±0) compared with CON (8±0; 7±0; 8±0), despite declining across the study for BFRW. CONCLUSIONS: The greater improvement in physical function with blood flow restriction demonstrates how this addition can increase the quality of simple walking exercise for populations that may be contraindicated to heavy-load resistance training.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedConstrictionExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood FlowWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy90/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations72
Citations/Year9.0
Relative Citation Ratio4.86
NIH Percentile92.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.18
Normalized Score0.86
Related Supplements