Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Controversies and Recent Developments of the Low-FODMAP Diet.

Gastroenterology & hepatology
January 1, 2017
Peta Hill et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and mechanistic effects of the low-FODMAP diet, comparing it with other therapies and assessing its potential risks and benefits.

Results Summary

The low-FODMAP diet's elimination phase is well-established for efficacy, with recent studies showing it is comparable or superior to other dietary and gut hypnotherapy interventions. However, the diet carries risks of nutritional inadequacy, disordered eating, and unfavorable gut microbiota changes, emphasizing the need for careful reintroduction during the maintenance phase.

Population

General population, with limited studies in children.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (15)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
low-fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharide and polyol (FODMAP) diet
neutral
elimination phase
-
-
efficacy is well established
#1
low-FODMAP diet
neutral
maintenance
-
-
success of maintaining this diet has been shown
#2
low-FODMAP diet
neutral
efficacy
-
-
comparable or superior to
#3
low-FODMAP diet
no change
efficacy
-
-
has been no comparison between
#4
gluten-free diet
decrease
FODMAP intake
-
-
moderately reduces
#5
dietary FODMAPs
no change
consistency of bowel actions
-
-
very limited effects on
#6
dietary FODMAPs
decrease
release of histamine
-
-
seem to suppress
#7
symptom pattern
no change
efficacy
-
-
is not a useful predictor of
#8
breath hydrogen testing for fructose or polyol malabsorption
no change
efficacy
-
-
is not a useful predictor of
#9
analysis of gut microbiota
neutral
predictor of efficacy
-
-
has potential
#10
low-FODMAP diet
neutral
nutritional inadequacy
-
-
carries risks of
#11
low-FODMAP diet
neutral
fostering disordered eating
-
-
carries risks of
#12
strict FODMAP restriction
neutral
potentially unfavorable gut microbiota
-
-
induces
#13
low-FODMAP diet
neutral
efficacy
children
-
do suggest benefit
#14
low-FODMAP diet
neutral
psychological and nutritional risks
children
-
should be implemented with care due to
#15
Abstract

The low-fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharide and polyol (FODMAP) diet is a 2-phased intervention, with strict reduction of all slowly absorbed or indigestible short-chain carbohydrates (ie, FODMAPs) followed by reintroduction of specific FODMAPs according to tolerance. The efficacy of the elimination phase of the FODMAP diet is well established, but the success of maintaining this diet has been shown in only a few observational studies. How the efficacy of the low-FODMAP diet compares with that of other therapies has received limited attention, but recent studies have shown this diet to be comparable or superior to diets that address eating style and choice of food as well as to gut hypnotherapy. There has been no comparison between the low-FODMAP diet and the gluten-free diet, which moderately reduces FODMAP intake. Mechanistically, dietary FODMAPs have very limited effects on the consistency of bowel actions but seem to suppress the release of histamine. Neither symptom pattern nor breath hydrogen testing for fructose or polyol malabsorption is a useful predictor of efficacy, but analysis of gut microbiota has potential. As a restrictive diet, the low-FODMAP diet carries risks of nutritional inadequacy and of fostering disordered eating, which has received little attention. Strict FODMAP restriction induces a potentially unfavorable gut microbiota, although the impact of this consequence upon health is unknown. This observation puts additional impetus on the reintroduction of FODMAPs according to tolerance during the maintenance phase of the diet. Studies of the low-FODMAP diet in children are few but do suggest benefit. However, such a strategy should be implemented with care due to the psychological and nutritional risks of a restrictive diet. Clinical wisdom is required in utilizing the low-FODMAP diet.

Study Links
PubMed ID28420945
Quality Scores
Safety65
Efficacy80/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations83
Citations/Year10.4
Relative Citation Ratio4.52
NIH Percentile91.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.12
Normalized Score0.73
Related Supplements