Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Safety of intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients.

Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis
June 1, 2017
Xiaojuan Li et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and IV iron in managing anemia in hemodialysis patients, focusing on potential cardiovascular and infection risks.

Results Summary

The study highlights concerns about the long-term safety of IV iron, including risks of oxidative stress, bacterial growth, and potential links to cardiovascular events and infections, while noting that ESAs reduce anemia but may have cardiovascular safety concerns. Existing evidence on safety is limited due to insufficient power and short follow-up in trials, with observational studies yielding inconsistent results.

Population

End-stage renal disease patients maintained by hemodialysis.

Effective Dosage

Not mentioned

Duration

Not mentioned

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs)
neutral
anemia
end-stage renal disease patients maintained by hemodialysis
-
has been managed primarily through
#1
intravenous (IV) iron
neutral
anemia
end-stage renal disease patients maintained by hemodialysis
-
has been managed primarily through
#2
IV iron supplementation
increase
hemoglobin production
-
-
promotes
#3
IV iron supplementation
decrease
ESA requirements
-
-
reduces
#4
IV iron use
increase
risk of CV events
hemodialysis patients
-
leading to concerns about
#5
IV iron use
increase
risk of infections
hemodialysis patients
-
leading to concerns about
#6
iron exposure
increase
infections
-
-
associated with increased risk of
#7
iron exposure
increase
CV events
-
-
associated with increased risk of
#8
Abstract

Among end-stage renal disease patients maintained by hemodialysis, anemia has been managed primarily through erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron. Following concerns about the cardiovascular (CV) safety of ESAs and changes in the reimbursement policies in Medicare's ESRD program, the use of IV iron has increased. IV iron supplementation promotes hemoglobin production and reduces ESA requirements, yet there exists relatively little evidence on the long-term safety of iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients. Labile iron can induce oxidative stress and is also essential in bacterial growth, leading to concerns about IV iron use and risk of CV events and infections in hemodialysis patients. Existing randomized controlled trials provide little evidence about safety due to insufficient power and short follow-up; recent observational studies have been inconsistent, but some have associated iron exposure with increased risk of infections and CV events. Given the widespread use and potential safety concerns related to IV iron, well-designed large prospective studies are needed to assess to identify optimal strategies for iron administration that maximize its benefits while avoiding potential risks.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnemiaDrug HypersensitivityHumansInjections, IntravenousIronKidney Failure, ChronicRenal Dialysis
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety40
Efficacy70/10
Quality60/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations17
Citations/Year2.1
Relative Citation Ratio0.87
NIH Percentile44.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.66
Normalized Score0.56
Safety of intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients. | Panacea Index