Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A Three Month Home Exercise Programme Augmented with Nordic Poles for Patients with Intermittent Claudication Enhances Quality of Life and Continues to Improve Walking Distance and Compliance After One Year.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
May 1, 2017
C Oakley et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleObservational StudyRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of a 12-week augmented home exercise program (using Nordic pole walking) on walking distance, speed, compliance, cost, quality of life, and ankle brachial pressure indices (ABPIs) in patients with intermittent claudication.

Results Summary

Both the augmented and control groups improved walking distance and speed over a year, with the augmented group showing significantly greater improvements (17.5 km vs. 5.6 km). Quality of life and ABPIs improved significantly after 12 weeks, with high compliance (98% in the augmented group).

Population

Patients with intermittent claudication.

Effective Dosage

Not specified (home exercise program augmented with Nordic pole walking).

Duration

12 weeks (with follow-up at 6 and 12 months).

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
home exercise programme augmented with Nordic pole walking
increase
walking distance
patients with intermittent claudication
-
continued to improve
#1
home exercise programme augmented with Nordic pole walking
increase
walking speed
patients with intermittent claudication
-
continued to improve
#2
home exercise programme augmented with Nordic pole walking
increase
compliance
patients with intermittent claudication
98%
excellent
#3
home exercise programme augmented with Nordic pole walking
increase
mean walking distance
patients with intermittent claudication
17.5 km
increased
#4
home exercise programme augmented with Nordic pole walking
increase
mean walking speed
patients with intermittent claudication
4.2 km/hour
increased
#5
normal walking (control)
increase
mean walking distance
patients with intermittent claudication
from 4.2 km to 5.6 km
increased
#6
normal walking (control)
increase
mean walking speed
patients with intermittent claudication
3.3 km/hour
increased
#7
normal walking (control)
increase
compliance
patients with intermittent claudication
74%
good
#8
augmented home exercise programme
increase
resting ankle brachial pressure indices (ABPIs)
patients with intermittent claudication
from mean ± SD 0.75 ± 0.12 to mean ± SD 0.85 ± 0.12
statistically significant increase
#9
augmented home exercise programme
increase
walking improvement parameters
patients with intermittent claudication
-
improved significantly
#10
augmented home exercise programme
increase
quality of life parameters
patients with intermittent claudication
-
improved significantly
#11
augmented home exercise programme
increase
mean health scores
patients with intermittent claudication
by 79%
improved
#12
Abstract

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to collect 1 year follow-up information on walking distance, speed, compliance, and cost in patients with intermittent claudication who took part in a previously reported 12 week randomised clinical trial of a home exercise programme augmented with Nordic pole walking versus controls who walked normally. A second objective was to look at quality of life and ankle brachial pressure indices (ABPIs) after a 12 week augmented home exercise programme. METHODS: Thirty-two of the 38 patients who completed the original trial were followed-up after 6 and 12 months. Frequency, duration, speed, and distance of walking were recorded using diaries and pedometers. A new observational cohort of 29 patients was recruited to the same augmented home exercise programme. ABPIs, walking improvement, and quality of life questionnaire were recorded at baseline and 12 weeks (end of the programme). RESULTS: Both groups in the follow-up study continued to improve their walking distance and speed over the following year. Compliance was excellent: 98% of the augmented group were still walking with poles at both 6 and 12 months, while 74% of the control group were still walking at the same point. The augmented group increased their mean walking distance to 17.5 km by 12 months, with a mean speed of 4.2 km/hour. The control group only increased their mean walking distance from 4.2 km to 5.6 km, and speed to 3.3 km/hour. Repeated ANOVA showed the results to be highly significant (p = .002). The 21/29 patients who completed the observational study showed a statistically significant increase in resting ABPIs from baseline (mean ± SD 0.75 ± 0.12) to week 12 (mean ± SD 0.85 ± 0.12) (t = (20) -8.89, p = .000 [two-tailed]). All their walking improvement and quality of life parameters improved significantly (p = .002 or less in the six categories) over the same period and their mean health scores improved by 79%. CONCLUSIONS: Following a 12 week augmented home exercise programme, most patients with intermittent claudication continued to significantly improve their walking distance and walking speed at 1 year compared with normal walking. Quality of life and ABPIs improved significantly after only 12 weeks and it is postulated that the improvement in ABPI was due to collateral development. These results justify the belief that an augmented home exercise programme will be as clinically effective as existing supervised exercise programmes, with the added benefits of lower cost and better compliance. Funding for a multicentre trial comparing an augmented home exercise programme with existing supervised exercise programme is now urgently required.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedAged, 80 and overEnglandExercise TherapyExercise ToleranceFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansIntermittent ClaudicationMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePeripheral Arterial DiseaseQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations7
Citations/Year0.9
Relative Citation Ratio0.41
NIH Percentile22.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.77
Normalized Score0.69
Related Supplements