Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

An empirically derived dietary pattern associated with breast cancer risk is validated in a nested case-control cohort from a randomized primary prevention trial.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN
February 1, 2017
Brandon H Hidaka et al. (4 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialValidation StudyHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether a dietary pattern high in dairy (Modern diet) was associated with breast cancer risk, particularly estrogen-receptor negative (ER-) subtypes.

Results Summary

A Modern diet (high in dairy, grains, and sugar) was associated with lower tissue omega-3 fatty acids, higher omega-6 and trans fatty acids, and increased ER- breast cancer risk among taller women. The low-fat dietary intervention increased the likelihood of a Modern diet post-randomization.

Population

High-risk U.S. women (n=65) and Canadian women in a breast cancer prevention trial (n=220 cases; 440 controls).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Modern diet
decrease
tissue omega-3 fatty acids
women
lower
was characterized as
#1
Modern diet
increase
tissue omega-6 fatty acids
women
higher
was characterized as
#2
Modern diet
increase
tissue trans fatty acids
women
higher
was characterized as
#3
low-fat intervention
increase
Modern diet
-
-
increased the likelihood of
#4
Modern diet
increase
estrogen-receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer risk
those at least 160 cm tall
-
was associated with
#5
Traditional diet
decrease
ER-positive (ER+) risk
the comparison group
lower
was associated with
#6
dietary fat reduction
increase
breast cancer risk
-
-
may have untoward effects on
#7
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We reported an association between cytologic atypia, a reversible biomarker of breast cancer risk, and lower omega-3/omega-6 fatty acid ratio in blood and breast tissue. Our goal was to develop and validate a dietary pattern index in this high-risk sample of U.S. women, and test its capacity to predict incidence in a nested case-control cohort of Canadian women from a randomized trial of a low-fat dietary intervention for primary prevention of breast cancer. METHODS: Food intake was measured by food frequency questionnaire in the U.S. sample (n = 65) and multiple dietary recalls in the Canadian sample (n = 220 cases; 440 controls). Principal component analysis identified a dietary pattern associated with atypia. We measured differences among dietary pattern tertiles in (a) fatty acid composition in blood lipids and breast tissue in the U.S. sample, and (b) risk of breast cancer subtypes in the Canadian cohort. Registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00148057. RESULTS: A Modern diet was characterized as consuming more grains, dairy, and sugar and less vegetables, fish and poultry; these women had lower tissue omega-3 fatty acids and higher omega-6 and trans fatty acids. The low-fat intervention increased the likelihood of a Modern diet after randomization. A Modern diet at baseline and post-randomization was associated with estrogen-receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer risk among those at least 160 cm tall. A Traditional diet (the reciprocal of Modern) at baseline was associated with lower ER-positive (ER+) risk in the comparison group, but not the low-fat intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: A Modern diet (high in grains, dairy, and sugar and low in vegetables, fish, and poultry) is associated with ER- breast cancer risk among taller women. Recommending dietary fat reduction may have untoward effects on breast cancer risk.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedBody HeightBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCase-Control StudiesDiet, Fat-RestrictedDiet, HealthyFatty AcidsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansIncidenceKansasLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrimary PreventionPrincipal Component AnalysisProspective StudiesProtective FactorsReceptors, EstrogenRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRisk Reduction Behavior
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy30/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations8
Citations/Year1.0
Relative Citation Ratio0.33
NIH Percentile17.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.79
Normalized Score0.47
Related Supplements