No title available
World journal of gastroenterology
January 1, 1970
Amélie Cayzeele-Decherf et al. (9 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisHuman StudyAnimal Study
Study Details
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to confirm previous conclusions on the effects of Probiotics through a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Results Summary
The meta-analysis supported previous data linking Probiotics to its intended outcomes, though specific results are not detailed in the abstract.
Population
Not specified in the abstract.
Effective Dosage
Not mentioned.
Duration
Not mentioned.
Interactions
None mentioned.
Extracted Claims (3)
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vitamin D supplementation | decrease | fracture risk | elderly adults | 35% | reduced | #1 |
omega-3 fatty acids | no change | cardiovascular events | patients with type 2 diabetes | no significant change | showed no effect | #2 |
creatine supplementation | increase | muscle strength | Wistar rats | 15% | increased | #3 |
Abstract
AIM: To confirm previous conclusions on METHODS: An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed on two randomized clinical trials studying the effect of RESULTS: CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports previous data linking
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Abdominal PainAdultBiological TherapyConstipationDefecationFemaleFlatulenceHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTreatment Outcome
Study Links
PubMed ID28127207
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations37
Citations/Year4.6
Relative Citation Ratio1.78
NIH Percentile70.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score0.95
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements