Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention, delivered either by post or with nurse support, in increasing physical activity levels among predominantly inactive adults.
Results Summary
The study found that both postal and nurse-supported pedometer interventions significantly increased daily step counts (by ~10%) and time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (by ~33%) compared to usual care, with no significant difference between the two intervention methods.
Population
Predominantly inactive adults aged 45-75 years without physical activity contraindications.
Effective Dosage
Pedometer use with a 12-week walking program and physical activity diaries; nurse group also received three physical activity consultations.
Duration
12 months
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pedometer-based walking intervention delivered by post | increase | step-counts | predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds | about one-tenth | increased | #1 |
pedometer-based walking intervention delivered by post | increase | time in MVPA in bouts | predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds | about one-third | increased | #2 |
pedometer-based walking intervention delivered by post | increase | average daily step-counts | predominantly inactive adults | 642 additional steps/d (95% CI 329-955) | increased | #3 |
pedometer-based walking intervention delivered by post | increase | time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts) | predominantly inactive adults | 33 additional min/wk (95% CI 17-49) | increased | #4 |
pedometer-based walking intervention with nurse support | increase | step-counts | predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds | about one-tenth | increased | #5 |
pedometer-based walking intervention with nurse support | increase | time in MVPA in bouts | predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds | about one-third | increased | #6 |
pedometer-based walking intervention with nurse support | increase | average daily step-counts | predominantly inactive adults | 677 additional steps/d (95% CI 365-989) | increased | #7 |
pedometer-based walking intervention with nurse support | increase | time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts) | predominantly inactive adults | 35 additional min/wk (95% CI 19-51) | increased | #8 |
pedometer-based walking intervention delivered by post | no change | 12-mo PA outcomes | predominantly inactive adults | - | no significant differences | #9 |
pedometer-based walking intervention with nurse support | no change | 12-mo PA outcomes | predominantly inactive adults | - | no significant differences | #10 |
BACKGROUND: Pedometers can increase walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels, but their effectiveness with or without support has not been rigorously evaluated. We assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive adults, delivered by post or through primary care nurse-supported physical activity (PA) consultations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial was randomised by household, with 12-mo follow-up, in seven London, United Kingdom, primary care practices. Eleven thousand fifteen randomly selected patients aged 45-75 y without PA contraindications were invited. Five hundred forty-eight self-reporting achieving PA guidelines were excluded. One thousand twenty-three people from 922 households were randomised between 2012-2013 to one of the following groups: usual care (n = 338); postal pedometer intervention (n = 339); and nurse-supported pedometer intervention (n = 346). Of these, 956 participants (93%) provided outcome data (usual care n = 323, postal n = 312, nurse-supported n = 321). Both intervention groups received pedometers, 12-wk walking programmes, and PA diaries. The nurse group was offered three PA consultations. Primary and main secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 12 mo in average daily step-counts and time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts), respectively, measured objectively by accelerometry. Only statisticians were masked to group. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Average baseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MVPA bouts was 94 (s.d. 102) min/wk. At 12 mo, mean steps/d, with s.d. in parentheses, were as follows: control 7,246 (2,671); postal 8,010 (2,922); and nurse support 8,131 (3,228). PA increased in both intervention groups compared with the control group; additional steps/d were 642 for postal (95% CI 329-955) and 677 for nurse support (95% CI 365-989); additional MVPA in bouts (min/wk) were 33 for postal (95% CI 17-49) and 35 for nurse support (95% CI 19-51). There were no significant differences between the two interventions at 12 mo. The 10% (1,023/10,467) recruitment rate was a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds increased step-counts by about one-tenth and time in MVPA in bouts by about one-third. Nurse and postal delivery achieved similar 12-mo PA outcomes. A primary care pedometer intervention delivered by post or with minimal support could help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934.