A systematic review of brief mental health and well-being interventions in organizational settings.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of brief mental health and well-being interventions, including massage, in organizational settings compared to longer-duration interventions.
Results Summary
The study found no evidence supporting the effectiveness of brief massage interventions for mental health and well-being in workplace settings. The majority of studies on brief interventions had a high risk of bias.
Population
Employees in organizational (workplace) settings.
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
brief stress management interventions | no change | mental health and well-being | organizational settings | no evidence | No evidence was found on the effectiveness | #1 |
brief relaxation interventions | no change | mental health and well-being | organizational settings | no evidence | No evidence was found on the effectiveness | #2 |
brief massage interventions | no change | mental health and well-being | organizational settings | no evidence | No evidence was found on the effectiveness | #3 |
brief mindfulness meditation interventions | no change | mental health and well-being | organizational settings | no evidence | No evidence was found on the effectiveness | #4 |
brief multimodal interventions | no change | mental health and well-being | organizational settings | no evidence | No evidence was found on the effectiveness | #5 |
brief positive psychology interventions | no change | mental health and well-being | organizational settings | limited evidence | limited evidence on the effectiveness | #6 |
Objectives The aim of the systematic review was to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of brief interventions targeting mental health and well-being in organizational settings and compare their effects with corresponding interventions of common (ie, longer) duration. Methods An extensive systematic search was conducted using the Medline and PsycINFO databases for the period of 2000-2016. Randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating primary or secondary brief interventions carried out in the workplace settings were included. Subsequently, common interventions matching brief interventions by type and assessed outcomes were included. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised using NICE guidelines and the best evidence synthesis approach was applied. Results The review identified 11 brief interventions and 9 corresponding common interventions. Included studies varied substantially in sample size and characteristics, methodological quality, duration of follow-up, types of intervention, and assessed outcomes. All but one study evaluating brief interventions had high risk of bias. No evidence was found on the effectiveness of brief stress management, relaxation, massage, mindfulness meditation, or multimodal interventions. We found limited evidence on the effectiveness of brief positive psychology interventions. Conclusions Our review highlights the need for high-quality studies evaluating brief mental health and well-being interventions in organizational settings. Future studies should use methodologically rigorous designs and improved reporting of methods and results to provide conclusive evidence on the effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention effects.