Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A systematic review of brief mental health and well-being interventions in organizational settings.

Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
January 1, 1970
Ivana Ivandic et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of brief mental health and well-being interventions, including massage, in organizational settings compared to longer-duration interventions.

Results Summary

The study found no evidence supporting the effectiveness of brief massage interventions for mental health and well-being in workplace settings. The majority of studies on brief interventions had a high risk of bias.

Population

Employees in organizational (workplace) settings.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
brief stress management interventions
no change
mental health and well-being
organizational settings
no evidence
No evidence was found on the effectiveness
#1
brief relaxation interventions
no change
mental health and well-being
organizational settings
no evidence
No evidence was found on the effectiveness
#2
brief massage interventions
no change
mental health and well-being
organizational settings
no evidence
No evidence was found on the effectiveness
#3
brief mindfulness meditation interventions
no change
mental health and well-being
organizational settings
no evidence
No evidence was found on the effectiveness
#4
brief multimodal interventions
no change
mental health and well-being
organizational settings
no evidence
No evidence was found on the effectiveness
#5
brief positive psychology interventions
no change
mental health and well-being
organizational settings
limited evidence
limited evidence on the effectiveness
#6
Abstract

Objectives The aim of the systematic review was to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of brief interventions targeting mental health and well-being in organizational settings and compare their effects with corresponding interventions of common (ie, longer) duration. Methods An extensive systematic search was conducted using the Medline and PsycINFO databases for the period of 2000-2016. Randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating primary or secondary brief interventions carried out in the workplace settings were included. Subsequently, common interventions matching brief interventions by type and assessed outcomes were included. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised using NICE guidelines and the best evidence synthesis approach was applied. Results The review identified 11 brief interventions and 9 corresponding common interventions. Included studies varied substantially in sample size and characteristics, methodological quality, duration of follow-up, types of intervention, and assessed outcomes. All but one study evaluating brief interventions had high risk of bias. No evidence was found on the effectiveness of brief stress management, relaxation, massage, mindfulness meditation, or multimodal interventions. We found limited evidence on the effectiveness of brief positive psychology interventions. Conclusions Our review highlights the need for high-quality studies evaluating brief mental health and well-being interventions in organizational settings. Future studies should use methodologically rigorous designs and improved reporting of methods and results to provide conclusive evidence on the effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention effects.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
CounselingHumansMental DisordersMental HealthOccupational HealthStress, PsychologicalTime FactorsWorkplace
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy10/10
Quality60/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations23
Citations/Year2.9
Relative Citation Ratio1.61
NIH Percentile67.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.49
Normalized Score0.36
Related Supplements