Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A qualitative exploration of participants' experiences of taking part in a walking programme: Perceived benefits, barriers, choices and use of intervention resources.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID
January 1, 2018
Fiona Mitchell et al. (8 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to explore the experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities participating in a walking programme (Walk Well) and assess its impact on physical activity.

Results Summary

Participants reported positive experiences with the programme, though not all showed significant increases in walking. Barriers included difficulties with self-monitoring and reliance on carers for support.

Population

Adults with intellectual disabilities.

Effective Dosage

Not specified.

Duration

Not specified.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
walking programmes
increase
physical activity
adults with intellectual disabilities
-
are an effective way to increase
#1
Walk Well walking programme
no change
walking
participants
-
not a significant increase in
#2
Walk Well walking programme
neutral
the programme
participants
-
reported positive experiences of taking part in
#3
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience significant inequalities and tend to be more sedentary and less physically active than the wider population. Walking programmes are an effective way to increase physical activity (PA) but have not been used in studies involving adults with intellectual disabilities. METHOD: Nineteen adults with intellectual disabilities participated in semistructured interviews or focus groups exploring their experiences of taking part in a walking programme (Walk Well). Data were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four overarching themes emerged: perceived benefits of taking part in the programme, perceived drawbacks/ barriers, walking choices and using the Walk Well resources. While there was not a significant increase in walking for all, the participants reported positive experiences of taking part in the programme. Self-monitoring proved difficult for some, particularly reading the daily step count recorded on the pedometer and writing it in the diary. Carers also played an important role in facilitating and preventing behaviour change in adults with intellectual disabilities. CONCLUSION: Additional barriers prevent many adults with intellectual disabilities from participating in PA. Capturing participant experiences provides important information for designing effective and equitable health improvement programmes.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety90
Efficacy65/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year1.4
Relative Citation Ratio0.96
NIH Percentile48.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.87
Normalized Score0.76
Related Supplements