Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effectiveness of traditional meditation retreats: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of psychosomatic research
January 1, 2017
Bassam Khoury et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisReviewSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of traditional meditation retreats on improving psychological outcomes in the general population.

Results Summary

The study found that meditation retreats were moderately to largely effective in reducing depression, anxiety, and stress, and improving quality of life, with large effects on mindfulness and compassion measures. Results were maintained at follow-up, though heterogeneity among trials limited implications.

Population

General population (N=2912 across 21 studies).

Effective Dosage

Not specified.

Duration

Varied by study (not specified in abstract).

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (11)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
traditional meditation retreats
increase
outcomes combined
general population
Hedge's g=0.45; 95% CI [0.35, 0.54]
are moderately effective
#1
traditional meditation retreats
increase
outcomes combined
general population
Hedge's g=0.49; 95% CI [0.36, 0.61]
are moderately effective
#2
traditional meditation retreats
no change
outcomes
general population
-
Results were maintained
#3
meditation styles
no change
effectiveness
general population
-
No differences were observed
#4
traditional meditation retreats
decrease
measures of anxiety, depression and stress
general population
-
suggested large effects
#5
traditional meditation retreats
increase
measures of emotional regulation and quality of life
general population
-
moderate effects
#6
traditional meditation retreats
increase
measures of mindfulness and compassion
general population
-
showed large effects
#7
traditional meditation retreats
increase
measures of acceptance
general population
-
moderate effects
#8
changes in mindfulness levels
increase
clinical effect sizes
general population
-
strongly moderated
#9
traditional meditation retreats
decrease
depression, anxiety, stress
participants
-
are moderately to largely effective in reducing
#10
traditional meditation retreats
increase
quality of life
participants
-
ameliorating
#11
Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies are investigating traditional meditation retreats. Very little, however, is known about their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of meditation retreats on improving psychological outcomes in general population. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of studies published in journals or as dissertations in PSYCINFO, PUBMED, CINAHL or Web of Science from the first available date until October 22, 2016. REVIEW METHODS: A total of 20 papers (21 studies, N=2912) were included. RESULTS: Effect-size estimates of outcomes combined suggested that traditional meditation retreats are moderately effective in pre-post analyses (n=19; Hedge's g=0.45; 95% CI [0.35, 0.54], p<0.00001) and in analyses comparing retreats to controls (n=14; Hedge's g=0.49; 95% CI [0.36, 0.61], p<0.00001). Results were maintained at follow-up. No differences were observed between meditation styles. Results suggested large effects on measures of anxiety, depression and stress, and moderate effects on measures of emotional regulation and quality of life. As to potential mechanisms of actions, results showed large effects on measures of mindfulness and compassion, and moderate effects on measures of acceptance. In addition, changes in mindfulness levels strongly moderated clinical effect sizes. However, heterogeneity was significant among trials, probably due to differences in study designs, types and duration of the retreats and assessed outcomes, limiting therefore the implications of the results. CONCLUSION: Meditation retreats are moderately to largely effective in reducing depression, anxiety, stress and in ameliorating the quality of life of participants.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansMeditationPsychology
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations40
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.48
NIH Percentile80.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.09
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements