Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Wheat challenge in self-reported gluten sensitivity: a comparison of scoring methods.

Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology
February 1, 2017
Gry I Skodje et al. (8 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an open bread challenge in diagnosing non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) and compare symptom changes against established cut-offs (Salerno and Monash).

Results Summary

The study found that 85% of patients were diagnosed with NCGS by clinicians, with significant symptom increases during the bread challenge. However, the proportion of NCGS cases was lower when applying Salerno (63%) and Monash (75%) cut-offs, highlighting variability in diagnostic criteria.

Population

56 patients (12 males) on self-instituted gluten-free diets with negative coeliac disease diagnostics.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (11)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
gluten-free diet
decrease
symptoms
patients with suspected NCGS
-
symptom relief
#1
gluten containing food challenge
neutral
non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS)
patients with suspected NCGS
-
may confirm the condition
#2
open bread challenge
increase
Total GSRS-IBS score
NCGS patients
-
increased significantly
#3
open bread challenge
increase
overall symptoms by VAS
NCGS patients
-
increased significantly
#4
open bread challenge
no change
Total GSRS-IBS score
non-NCGS patients
-
not increased
#5
open bread challenge
no change
overall symptoms by VAS
non-NCGS patients
-
not increased
#6
open bread challenge
increase
Total GSRS-IBS challenge score
NCGS patients
53 vs. 37
were significantly higher
#7
open bread challenge
increase
overall symptoms by VAS
NCGS patients
76 vs. 39 mm
were significantly higher
#8
Salerno cut-off
neutral
NCGS
patients with suspected NCGS
63%
classified
#9
Monash cut-off
neutral
NCGS
patients with suspected NCGS
75%
classified
#10
clinician's diagnosis
neutral
NCGS
patients with suspected NCGS
85%
diagnosed
#11
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The condition non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is clinically similar to coeliac disease, but lack objective diagnostic criteria. Symptom relief on gluten-free diet followed by gluten containing food challenge may confirm the condition in clinical settings. AIM: To describe the results of an open bread challenge in patients with suspected NCGS, and to compare the results with recently suggested cut-offs for symptom change. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients (12 males) self-instituted on gluten-free diet with negative coeliac disease diagnostics were examined for NCGS by an open bread challenge. Symptoms were reported by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, IBS-version (GSRS-IBS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Results were retrospectively compared to the Salerno and Monash cut-offs for symptom change. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were diagnosed with NCGS. Total GSRS-IBS score and overall symptoms by VAS increased significantly in NCGS (p < .001), but not in non-NCGS patients (p < .12 and p = .08, respectively). Total GSRS-IBS challenge score and overall symptoms by VAS were significantly higher in NCGS than in non-NCGS patients (53 vs. 37, p = .004 and 76 vs. 39 mm, p = .02, respectively). Applying the Salerno and Monash cut-offs, 63 and 75% would be classified with NCGS, respectively. According to total GSRS-IBS absolute agreement was lowest between clinician's diagnosis and Salerno cut-off (63%) and highest between Salerno and Monash cut-offs (88%). CONCLUSION: Clinician diagnosed 85% with NCGS. The proportion of NCGS was lower according to the Salerno and Monash cut-offs. The Salerno cut-off should be the starting point for a common definition of symptom change.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedCeliac DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialDiet, Gluten-FreeFemaleGlutensHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexWheat HypersensitivityYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations7
Citations/Year0.9
Relative Citation Ratio0.41
NIH Percentile22.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.77
Normalized Score0.69
Related Supplements