Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) versus Supportive Expressive Group Therapy (SET) for distressed breast cancer survivors: evaluating mindfulness and social support as mediators.

Journal of behavioral medicine
June 1, 2017
Melanie P J Schellekens et al. (11 authors)
Journal ArticleMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether changes in mindfulness and/or social support mediated the effects of Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) compared to Supportive Expressive Group Therapy (SET) on mood disturbance, stress symptoms, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Results Summary

MBCR participants showed greater improvement in mood disturbance and stress symptoms compared to SET participants, with increased social support partially mediating these effects. No significant differences were observed in mindfulness or quality of life between the groups.

Population

Distressed breast cancer survivors

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
decrease
mood disturbance
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
improved significantly more on
#1
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
decrease
stress symptoms
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
improved significantly more on
#2
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
increase
social support
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
improved significantly more on
#3
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
no change
quality of life
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
no group differences on
#4
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
no change
mindfulness
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
no group differences on
#5
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
decrease
mood disturbance
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
increased social support partially mediated the impact of
#6
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR)
decrease
stress symptoms
distressed breast cancer survivors
-
increased social support partially mediated the impact of
#7
Abstract

Despite growing evidence in support of mindfulness as an underlying mechanism of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), it has been suggested that nonspecific therapeutic factors, such as the experience of social support, may contribute to the positive effects of MBIs. In the present study, we examined whether change in mindfulness and/or social support mediated the effect of Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) compared to another active intervention (i.e. Supportive Expressive Group Therapy (SET)), on change in mood disturbance, stress symptoms and quality of life. A secondary analysis was conducted of a multi-site randomized clinical trial investigating the impacts of MBCR and SET on distressed breast cancer survivors (MINDSET). We applied the causal steps approach with bootstrapping to test mediation, using pre- and post-intervention questionnaire data of the participants who were randomised to MBCR (n = 69) or SET (n = 70). MBCR participants improved significantly more on mood disturbance, stress symptoms and social support, but not on quality of life or mindfulness, compared to SET participants. Increased social support partially mediated the impact of MBCR versus SET on mood disturbance and stress symptoms. Because no group differences on mindfulness and quality of life were observed, no mediation analyses were performed on these variables. Findings showed that increased social support was related to more improvement in mood and stress after MBCR compared to support groups, whereas changes in mindfulness were not. This suggests a more important role for social support in enhancing outcomes in MBCR than previously thought.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Cancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMindfulnessPsychotherapy, GroupQuality of LifeSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnaires
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations39
Citations/Year4.9
Relative Citation Ratio1.89
NIH Percentile72.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.17
Normalized Score0.65
Related Supplements
Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) versus Supportive E... | Panacea Index