Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effects of different regimens of iron prophylaxis on maternal iron status and pregnancy outcome: a randomized control trial.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
August 1, 2017
Francesca Parisi et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of different iron supplementation regimens on maternal hematological status and pregnancy outcomes in healthy pregnant women.

Results Summary

Both liposomal iron (14 mg and 28 mg) groups showed significantly higher hemoglobin and ferritin levels compared to controls, with the 28 mg group also resulting in higher birth weight. Liposomal iron demonstrated similar efficacy to higher doses of ferrous iron while potentially reducing side effects.

Population

Healthy pregnant women (non-anemic, normal singleton pregnancy) recruited at 11-13 weeks.

Effective Dosage

Ferrous iron 30 mg, liposomal iron 14 mg (Sideral®), and liposomal iron 28 mg daily.

Duration

Up to 6 weeks post-partum.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (10)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
liposomal iron 28 mg/daily (LI28)
increase
hemoglobin concentrations
healthy pregnant women
-
showed significantly higher
#1
liposomal iron 28 mg/daily (LI28)
increase
ferritin concentrations
healthy pregnant women
-
showed significantly higher
#2
liposomal iron 14 mg (LI14)
increase
hemoglobin concentrations
healthy pregnant women
-
showed significantly higher
#3
liposomal iron 14 mg (LI14)
increase
ferritin concentrations
healthy pregnant women
-
showed significantly higher
#4
liposomal iron 28 mg/daily (LI28)
increase
birth weight
healthy pregnant women
3499 ± 464.1 g
resulting in higher
#5
liposomal iron 28 mg/daily (LI28)
increase
birth weight
controls
3092 ± 469.5 g
compared with
#6
28 mg and 14 mg LI
neutral
maternal anemia prevention
healthy pregnant women
-
effectiveness
#7
LI
neutral
maternal hematological parameters
healthy pregnant women
-
similar effects of higher doses of ferrous iron
#8
LI
decrease
iron doses
-
-
allowing to reduce
#9
LI
decrease
side effects
-
-
allowing to reduce
#10
Abstract

PURPOSE: Iron supplementation is associated with side effects and overload risk. We compared different regimens of iron supplementation on maternal hematological status and pregnancy outcome in a cohort of healthy pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty non-anemic women with a normal singleton pregnancy were recruited at 11-13 weeks and randomized into controls (C; n = 20) and groups supplemented with ferrous iron 30 mg (FI; n = 20), liposomal iron 14 mg (Sideral® Pharmanutra, Pisa PI, Italy) (LI14; n = 20) and liposomal iron 28 mg/daily (LI28; n = 20) up to 6 weeks post-partum. Longitudinal maternal blood samples for iron markers were collected. Data on birth outcome were recorded. The treatment effect was evaluated using a mixed-effect regression model. RESULTS: Both LI28 and LI14 groups showed significantly higher hemoglobin and ferritin concentrations compared with controls. Birth weight showed a trend to increase with supplementation, resulting in higher birth weight in the LI28 group compared with controls (3499 ± 464.1 g and 3092 ± 469.5 g, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the effectiveness of 28 mg and 14 mg LI on maternal anemia prevention, as previously reported with FI 40 mg. LI has similar effects of higher doses of ferrous iron on maternal hematological parameters, thus allowing to reduce iron doses and side effects.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdolescentAdultAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBirth WeightDietary SupplementsFemaleFerritinsGestational AgeHemoglobinsHumansIronMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations34
Citations/Year4.3
Relative Citation Ratio2.04
NIH Percentile75.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.07
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements