Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Maintaining gait stability during dual walking task: effects of age and neurological disorders.

European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine
February 1, 2017
Marco Tramontano et al. (9 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate the effects of dual-task interference on upright gait stability during walking across different population groups.

Results Summary

All subjects showed reduced walking speed during dual-task conditions, with significant differences among groups. Trunk acceleration measurements indicated changes in stability along different axes during dual-task walking, particularly in subjects with cerebral palsy and stroke.

Population

Healthy young, healthy elderly, children with typical development, children with cerebral palsy, and adults with stroke in subacute phase.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
dual task walking
decrease
walking speed
All subjects
-
showed a reduced speed
#1
dual task walking
decrease
reduction in walking speed
healthy young, healthy elderly, children with typical development, children with cerebral palsy and adults with stroke in subacute phase
F(4,81)=12.253, P<0.001, effect size 0.377
significantly different among groups
#2
dual task walking
increase
Root Mean Square (RMS) of the trunk acceleration along the latero-lateral axis
All subjects
-
appeared to be increased
#3
dual task walking
decrease
Root Mean Square (RMS) of the trunk acceleration along the anterio-posterior axis
All subjects
-
reduced
#4
dual task walking
decrease
Root Mean Square (RMS) of the trunk acceleration along the cranio-caudal axis
All subjects
-
reduced
#5
dual task walking
neutral
trunk accelerations
subjects affected by cerebral palsy and stroke
-
significantly related to the changes in speed
#6
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual task paradigm is a common mechanism of daily life, and it is often used for investigating the effect on cognitive processing of motor behavior. AIM: In the present study we investigate the dual task interference during walking on upright gait stability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Inpatient neurorehabilitation unit and children neurorehabilitation unit. POPULATION: Eighty-five subjects were enrolled, divided into five groups: healthy young, healthy elderly, children with typical development, children with cerebral palsy and adults with stroke in subacute phase. METHODS: All subjects had to walk through a pathway during which they had to hear a sound, turn the head to watch a number and verbalize it. Subjects wore an accelerometer on their lumbar spine to measure upright gait stability have been assessed by means of the Root Mean Square (RMS) of the trunk acceleration. RESULTS: All subjects showed a reduced speed when performing a dual task with respect to single task. This reduction was significantly different among groups (F(4,81)=12.253, P<0.001, effect size 0.377). The RMS appeared to be increased along the latero-lateral axis, and reduced along the anterio-posterior and the cranio-caudal axes during the dual task walking. CONCLUSIONS: These accelerations were significantly related to the changes in speed that were managed in a different way in subjects affected by cerebral palsy and stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The information obtained in this study may be used to support specific rehabilitation techniques in subjects with poor balance ability.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AccelerometryAdultAgedAgingAnalysis of VarianceCerebral PalsyChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansInpatientsMalePostural BalancePsychomotor PerformanceRehabilitation CentersSoundStrokeStroke RehabilitationWalking SpeedYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations37
Citations/Year4.6
Relative Citation Ratio3.05
NIH Percentile85.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.08
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements