Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Calcium intake: good for the bones but bad for the heart? An analysis of clinical studies.

Archives of endocrinology and metabolism
June 1, 2016
Guilherme Alcantara Cunha Lima et al. (8 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the role of dietary calcium intake and supplementation in bone health, cardiovascular risk, and metabolic functions.

Results Summary

Calcium supplementation supports peak bone mass acquisition and fracture prevention but may pose uncertain cardiovascular risks, while dietary calcium intake shows no such risks. The study suggests prioritizing nutritional calcium sources over supplements unless medically necessary.

Population

General population, with focus on youth (bone mass acquisition) and elderly (fracture prevention).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
proper dietary calcium intake and calcium supplementation
increase
peak bone mass
youth
-
important factors in the acquisition
#1
proper dietary calcium intake and calcium supplementation
decrease
fractures
old age
-
important factors in the prevention
#2
calcium
increase
resistance
-
-
confers an increase
#3
calcium supplementation
neutral
control of blood pressure, plasma glucose, body weight, lipid profile and endothelial function
-
-
can directly or indirectly affect
#4
calcium supplementation
increase
cardiovascular risk
-
-
increased
#5
consumption of foods rich in calcium
no change
cardiovascular risk
-
-
reported no increase
#6
Abstract

The proper dietary calcium intake and calcium supplementation, when indicated, are important factors in the acquisition of peak bone mass during youth and in the prevention of fractures in old age. In addition to its deposition in bone, calcium confers an increase in its resistance and exhibits important activities in different enzymatic pathways in the body (e.g., neural, hormonal, muscle-related and blood clotting pathways). Thus, calcium supplementation can directly or indirectly affect important functions in the body, such as the control of blood pressure, plasma glucose, body weight, lipid profile and endothelial function. Since one publication reported increased cardiovascular risk due to calcium supplementation, many researchers have studied whether this risk actually exists; the results are conflicting, and the involved mechanisms are uncertain. However, studies that have evaluated the influence of the consumption of foods rich in calcium have reported no increase in the cardiovascular risk, which suggests that nutritional intake should be prioritized as a method for supplementation and that the use of calcium supplements should be reserved for patients who truly need supplementation and are unable to achieve the recommended daily nutritional intake of calcium.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Age FactorsBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone and BonesCalciumCalcium, DietaryCardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsFractures, BoneHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicOsteoporosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecommended Dietary AllowancesRisk FactorsVitamin D
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety70
Efficacy80/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations14
Citations/Year1.6
Relative Citation Ratio0.81
NIH Percentile42.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.74
Normalized Score0.75
Related Supplements
Calcium intake: good for the bones but bad for the heart? An... | Panacea Index