Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

When Is It Appropriate to Use Glutamine in Critical Illness?

Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
August 1, 2016
Manpreet S Mundi et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill, ventilated ICU patients.

Results Summary

The study found no significant benefits of glutamine supplementation in ventilated ICU patients, with trends toward increased mortality. Antioxidants' effects were not separately highlighted in the results.

Population

Ventilated ICU patients in 40 ICUs (REDOXS trial) and 14 ICUs (MetaPlus trial).

Effective Dosage

Not specified for antioxidants.

Duration

Not specified for antioxidants.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (10)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
glutamine supplementation
increase
clinical outcomes
-
-
demonstrated positive treatment effects
#1
intravenous (IV) glutamine
decrease
hospital mortality
-
-
significant reduction
#2
intravenous (IV) glutamine
decrease
intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS)
-
-
significant reduction
#3
intravenous (IV) glutamine
decrease
hospital LOS
-
-
significant reduction
#4
glutamine supplementation
no change
efficacy
ventilated ICU patients
-
similar results were not noted
#5
glutamine (IV and enteral)
increase
28-day mortality
ventilated ICU patients
-
trend toward increased
#6
glutamine (IV and enteral)
increase
hospital mortality
ventilated ICU patients
-
significant increased
#7
glutamine (IV and enteral)
increase
6-month mortality
ventilated ICU patients
-
significant increased
#8
glutamine-enriched enteral diet
increase
6-month mortality
ventilated ICU patients
-
increased
#9
glutamine supplementation
increase
-
burn and elective surgery patients
-
demonstrated benefits
#10
Abstract

Glutamine is a nonessential amino acid, which under trauma or critical illness can become essential. A number of historic small single-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated positive treatment effects on clinical outcomes with glutamine supplementation. Meta-analyses based on these trials demonstrated a significant reduction in hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS with intravenous (IV) glutamine. Similar results were not noted in 2 large multicenter RCTs (REDOXS and MetaPlus) assessing the efficacy of glutamine supplementation in ventilated ICU patients. The REDOXS trial of 40 ICUs randomized 1223 ventilated ICU patients to glutamine (IV and enteral), antioxidants, both glutamine and antioxidants, or placebo. The main conclusions were a trend toward increased 28-day mortality and significant increased hospital and 6-month mortality in those who received glutamine. The MetaPlus trial of 14 ICUs, which randomized 301 ventilated ICU patients to glutamine-enriched enteral vs an isocaloric diet, noted increased 6-month mortality in the glutamine-supplemented group. Newer RCTs have focused on specific populations and have demonstrated benefits in burn and elective surgery patients with glutamine supplementation. Whether larger studies will confirm these findings is yet to be determined. Recent American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guidelines recommend that IV and enteral glutamine should not be used in the critical care setting based on the moderate quality of evidence available. We agree with these recommendations and would encourage larger multicenter studies to evaluate the risks and benefits of glutamine in burn and elective surgery patients.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Critical CareCritical IllnessDietary SupplementsEnteral NutritionGlutamineHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, Artificial
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy50/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year0.7
Relative Citation Ratio0.25
NIH Percentile12.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.77
Normalized Score0.57
Related Supplements