Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Very low doses of direct intravenous iron in each session as maintenance therapy in hemodialysis patients.

Renal failure
August 1, 2016
Javier Deira et al. (9 authors)
Clinical TrialJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine if a 20 mg dose of IV iron administered at the end of each hemodialysis session was more effective than prior iron therapy in maintaining erythropoiesis activity and functional iron levels.

Results Summary

The study found no significant changes in reticulocyte count or CHr after four weeks of treatment, indicating maintained erythropoiesis activity and functional iron levels. Patients without prior iron therapy showed high functional iron levels but no increase in serum ferritin or hepcidin.

Population

36 hemodialysis patients, 23 of whom had prior IV iron maintenance therapy.

Effective Dosage

20 mg IV iron at the end of each hemodialysis session.

Duration

Four weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (15)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
erythropoiesis activity (EA) levels
hemodialysis (HD) patients
-
keeps
#1
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
functional iron (FI) levels
hemodialysis (HD) patients
-
keeps
#2
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
decrease
iron overload administered
hemodialysis (HD) patients
-
allows reducing
#3
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
decrease
iron stores markers
some patients
-
allows decreasing
#4
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
reticulocyte count
36 patients
49.7 ± 23.8 × 10(3) before and 47.2 ± 17.2 × 10(3) after
showed
#5
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
CHr
36 patients
34.8 ± 3.7 pg and 34.4 ± 3.5 pg
showed
#6
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
neutral
CHr with serum iron
36 patients
r = 0.6
showed an excellent correlation
#7
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
neutral
CHr with saturation transferrin
36 patients
r = 0.49
showed an excellent correlation
#8
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
CHr with serum ferritin
36 patients
r = 0.23
that is not shown
#9
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
CHr with hepcidin levels
36 patients
r = 0.22
that is not shown
#10
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
C-Reactive Protein with reticulocyte count
36 patients
-
There was not a correlation
#11
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
C-Reactive Protein with CHr
36 patients
-
There was not a correlation
#12
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
increase
FI levels
13 patients who did not receive the iron prior to the study
-
showed high
#13
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
serum ferritin
13 patients who did not receive the iron prior to the study
-
showed not an increased
#14
20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance
no change
serum hepcidin levels
13 patients who did not receive the iron prior to the study
-
showed not an increased
#15
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) iron supplementation is widely used in hemodialysis (HD) patients to treat their periodic losses. However, the ideal dose and frequency is unknown. The goal of the study is to see if a 20 mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance is better than the iron prior therapy. We analyze the erythropoiesis activity (EA) and functional iron (FI) after four weeks of treatment. METHODS: In 36 patients, we measure reticulocyte count and content of hemoglobin reticulocyte (CHr) as EA and FI markers, respectively, before and after the treatment. Before the study, 23 patients received another different therapy with IV iron as maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Reticulocyte count: 49.7 ± 23.8 × 10(3) before and 47.2 ± 17.2 × 10(3) after the treatment (p= 0.51). The CHr: 34.8 ± 3.7 pg and 34.4 ± 3.5 pg, respectively, (p= 0.35), showing an excellent correlation with the other FI markers (serum iron r = 0.6; p = 0.001; saturation transferrin r = 0.49; p = 0.004); that is not shown with the serum ferritin (r = 0.23; p = 0.192) or the hepcidin levels (r = 0.22; p = 0.251). There was not a correlation between the C-Reactive Protein, reticulocyte count, and CHr. The 13 patients who did not receive the iron prior to the study showed high FI levels, but not an increased of the serum ferritin or the serum hepcidin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a small quantity of iron at the end of every HD session keeps the EA and the FI levels and allows reducing the iron overload administered and/or decreasing the iron stores markers in some patients.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Administration, IntravenousAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinErythropoiesisFemaleFerric CompoundsFerric Oxide, SaccharatedFerritinsGlucaric AcidHematinicsHemoglobinsHepcidinsHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleRenal DialysisReticulocyte CountReticulocytesTransferrin
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year0.7
Relative Citation Ratio0.33
NIH Percentile17.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.57
Normalized Score0.60
Related Supplements