Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Randomised clinical trial: mixed soluble/insoluble fibre vs. psyllium for chronic constipation.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
July 1, 2016
A Erdogan et al. (7 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a mixed soluble/insoluble fibre supplement versus psyllium in treating constipation.

Results Summary

Psyllium significantly increased complete spontaneous bowel movements and improved stool consistency, straining, bloating, and quality of life, with no significant difference compared to mixed fibre. However, mixed fibre was more effective in relieving flatulence and dissolved better.

Population

Constipated patients meeting Rome III criteria.

Effective Dosage

5 g twice daily.

Duration

4 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (11)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre
increase
complete spontaneous bowel movement/week
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P < 0.0001
increased
#1
psyllium
increase
complete spontaneous bowel movement/week
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P = 0.0002
increased
#2
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre
increase
complete spontaneous bowel movement/week
Constipated patients (Rome III)
30 (75%)
were responders
#3
psyllium
increase
complete spontaneous bowel movement/week
Constipated patients (Rome III)
24 (75%)
were responders
#4
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre and psyllium
increase
stool consistency
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P = 0.04
increased
#5
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre and psyllium
decrease
straining scores
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P = 0.006
decreased
#6
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre and psyllium
decrease
bloating scores
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P = 0.02
decreased
#7
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre
decrease
flatulence
Constipated patients (Rome III)
53%
improvement in flatulence
#8
psyllium
decrease
flatulence
Constipated patients (Rome III)
25%
improvement in flatulence
#9
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre
increase
dissolvability
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P = 0.02
dissolved better
#10
mixed soluble/insoluble fibre and psyllium
increase
quality of life (QoL)
Constipated patients (Rome III)
P = 0.0125
improved
#11
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibre supplements are useful, but whether a plum-derived mixed fibre that contains both soluble and insoluble fibre improves constipation is unknown. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of mixed soluble/insoluble fibre vs. psyllium in a randomized double-blind controlled trial. METHODS: Constipated patients (Rome III) received mixed fibre or psyllium, 5 g b.d., for 4 weeks. Daily symptoms and stool habit were assessed using stool diary. Subjects with ≥1 complete spontaneous bowel movement/week above baseline for ≥2/4 weeks were considered responders. Secondary outcome measures included stool consistency, bowel satisfaction, straining, gas, bloating, taste, dissolvability and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects (mixed fibre = 40; psyllium = 32) were enrolled and two from psyllium group withdrew. The mean complete spontaneous bowel movement/week increased with both mixed fibre (P < 0.0001) and psyllium (P = 0.0002) without group difference. There were 30 (75%) responders with mixed fibre and 24 (75%) with psyllium (P = 0.9). Stool consistency increased (P = 0.04), straining (P = 0.006) and bloating scores decreased (P = 0.02) without group differences. Significantly more patients reported improvement in flatulence (53% vs. 25%, P = 0.01) and felt that mixed fibre dissolved better (P = 0.02) compared to psyllium. QoL improved (P = 0.0125) with both treatments without group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed fibre and psyllium were equally efficacious in improving constipation and QoL. Mixed fibre was more effective in relieving flatulence, bloating and dissolved better. Mixed fibre is effective and well tolerated.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultConstipationDefecationDietary FiberDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFlatulenceHumansLaxativesMalePsylliumQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy80/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations40
Citations/Year4.4
Relative Citation Ratio2.34
NIH Percentile79%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.11
Normalized Score0.84
Related Supplements