Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Safety and Efficacy of an Early Home-Based Walking Program After Receipt of an Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
August 1, 2016
Emily T Lau et al. (4 authors)
Clinical TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an early home-based walking program for first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients.

Results Summary

The study found that early ambulation after ICD implantation was safe, with few ICD shocks (6.3% of participants) and improved efficacy, including increased daily steps (806 more steps over 3 months) and enhanced perceived exercise self-efficacy. Hospitalizations related to ICD shocks were rare (2%) and not associated with walking.

Population

Cardiac patients (N=301) with an initial ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention, predominantly older white men with low ejection fraction and comorbidities.

Effective Dosage

Not specified (early home-based walking protocol implemented 1-month post-ICD implant).

Duration

3 months

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Early home-based walking protocol
no change
safety
first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients
-
was safe
#1
Early home-based walking protocol
increase
efficacy
first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients
-
was effective
#2
Early home-based walking protocol
increase
average steps per day
ICD recipients
806 over 3 months
increased
#3
Early home-based walking protocol
increase
perceived exercise self-efficacy
ICD recipients
-
improved significantly
#4
Early home-based walking protocol
increase
weekly exercise
ICD recipients
-
improved
#5
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of an early home-based walking program for first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients. DESIGN: Pre-post intervention trial. SETTING: Institutional and private practice. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiac patients (N=301) with an initial ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention; able to read, speak, and write English; and having access to telephone. INTERVENTIONS: Early home-based walking protocol implemented 1-month post-ICD implant. Exercise tolerance monitored by study nurses via telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety assessment was based on the frequency of ICD therapies and hospitalizations, and efficacy assessment was based on pedometer measures and self-report of ICD self-efficacy and physical activity. RESULTS: ICD recipients were on average 64.1±11.9 years old, predominantly men, and white, with an ejection fraction of <35% and a mean Charlson comorbidity score of 2.3±1.5. Nineteen individuals (6.3%) received 28 ICD shocks; 15 (53.6%) were appropriate and 13 (46.4%) inappropriate. Antitachycardia pacing therapies were delivered 72 times in 18 individuals (6%), with 61 (84.7%) being appropriate and 11 (15.3%) inappropriate. Five ICD shocks (2 appropriate and 3 inappropriate) and 2 antitachycardia pacing therapies occurred during walking. Five participants (2%) were hospitalized for an ICD shock, none of which was associated with walking. Average steps per day increased by 806 over 3 months. Perceived exercise self-efficacy improved significantly as did weekly exercise. Predictors of receiving any ICD shock were younger age (P<.0001), moderate to severe renal disease (P=.001), and lymphoma (P=.024). CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation after an initial ICD was safe and effective, with few ICD shocks and improved efficacy.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDefibrillators, ImplantableEarly AmbulationExercise TherapyExercise ToleranceFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacyWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy80/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations8
Citations/Year0.9
Relative Citation Ratio0.42
NIH Percentile22.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.67
Normalized Score0.81
Related Supplements