Safety and Efficacy of an Early Home-Based Walking Program After Receipt of an Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an early home-based walking program for first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients.
Results Summary
The study found that early ambulation after ICD implantation was safe, with few ICD shocks (6.3% of participants) and improved efficacy, including increased daily steps (806 more steps over 3 months) and enhanced perceived exercise self-efficacy. Hospitalizations related to ICD shocks were rare (2%) and not associated with walking.
Population
Cardiac patients (N=301) with an initial ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention, predominantly older white men with low ejection fraction and comorbidities.
Effective Dosage
Not specified (early home-based walking protocol implemented 1-month post-ICD implant).
Duration
3 months
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early home-based walking protocol | no change | safety | first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients | - | was safe | #1 |
Early home-based walking protocol | increase | efficacy | first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients | - | was effective | #2 |
Early home-based walking protocol | increase | average steps per day | ICD recipients | 806 over 3 months | increased | #3 |
Early home-based walking protocol | increase | perceived exercise self-efficacy | ICD recipients | - | improved significantly | #4 |
Early home-based walking protocol | increase | weekly exercise | ICD recipients | - | improved | #5 |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of an early home-based walking program for first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients. DESIGN: Pre-post intervention trial. SETTING: Institutional and private practice. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiac patients (N=301) with an initial ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention; able to read, speak, and write English; and having access to telephone. INTERVENTIONS: Early home-based walking protocol implemented 1-month post-ICD implant. Exercise tolerance monitored by study nurses via telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety assessment was based on the frequency of ICD therapies and hospitalizations, and efficacy assessment was based on pedometer measures and self-report of ICD self-efficacy and physical activity. RESULTS: ICD recipients were on average 64.1±11.9 years old, predominantly men, and white, with an ejection fraction of <35% and a mean Charlson comorbidity score of 2.3±1.5. Nineteen individuals (6.3%) received 28 ICD shocks; 15 (53.6%) were appropriate and 13 (46.4%) inappropriate. Antitachycardia pacing therapies were delivered 72 times in 18 individuals (6%), with 61 (84.7%) being appropriate and 11 (15.3%) inappropriate. Five ICD shocks (2 appropriate and 3 inappropriate) and 2 antitachycardia pacing therapies occurred during walking. Five participants (2%) were hospitalized for an ICD shock, none of which was associated with walking. Average steps per day increased by 806 over 3 months. Perceived exercise self-efficacy improved significantly as did weekly exercise. Predictors of receiving any ICD shock were younger age (P<.0001), moderate to severe renal disease (P=.001), and lymphoma (P=.024). CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation after an initial ICD was safe and effective, with few ICD shocks and improved efficacy.