Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Influence of diet and supplements on iron status after gastric bypass surgery.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery
January 1, 2016
Renee A Mischler et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleObservational StudyHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the impact of dietary and supplemental iron sources, along with absorptive factors, on iron status in individuals who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Results Summary

Heme iron intake from meat was favorably associated with improved iron status biomarkers, vitamin C from food contributed positively, and adherence to recommended iron supplements (45 mg/d) was linked to higher serum ferritin levels. Iron deficiency was found in 42% of participants.

Population

Females (97%) with a mean age of 45 years who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Effective Dosage

45 mg/d of supplementary non-heme iron.

Duration

Not specified.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Dietary intake of heme iron
increase
ferritin
individuals who underwent RYGB
β = .366
was favorably associated with
#1
Dietary intake of heme iron
decrease
sTfR:ferritin ratio
individuals who underwent RYGB
β = -.459
was favorably associated with
#2
Dietary intake of heme iron
decrease
total iron binding capacity
individuals who underwent RYGB
β = -18.26
was favorably associated with
#3
Intake of vitamin C from food
increase
ferritin
individuals who underwent RYGB
β = .010
contributed to
#4
Intake of vitamin C from food
decrease
sTfR:ferritin ratio
individuals who underwent RYGB
β = -.011
contributed to
#5
Use of supplementary non-heme iron
increase
serum ferritin
individuals who underwent RYGB
β = .964
was positively associated with
#6
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is common after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, but there is no consensus on the optimal diet quality and quantity for restoring and preserving iron status. OBJECTIVES: The authors explored the impact of dietary and supplemental sources of iron and absorptive factors on iron status. SETTING: Academic, United States. METHODS: In a cross-sectional cohort of individuals who underwent RYGB, nutrient intakes from food and supplements were measured using 3-day food records. Blood biomarkers of iron status, including concentrations of ferritin, total iron binding capacity, serum transferrin receptor (sTfR), and the sTfR:ferritin ratio, were assessed by a reference laboratory; iron deficiency was defined as having at least 2 abnormal measures. Associations between iron status biomarkers and dietary predictors were determined using regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 36 participants, 97% were female, the mean age was 45 years (95% confidence interval, 41-48 years), and body mass index was 32 (30-35) kg/m(2). Iron deficiency was found in 42% of participants. Dietary intake of heme iron, found in meats, was favorably associated with 3 iron status biomarkers (ferritin, β = .366; sTfR:ferritin ratio, β = -.459; and total iron binding capacity, β = -18.26; all P<.05), independent of obesity-induced inflammation. Intake of vitamin C from food contributed to iron status (ferritin, β = .010 and sTfR:ferritin ratio, β = -.011; P<.05). Use of supplementary non-heme iron, at doses recommended for prophylaxis (45 mg/d), was positively associated with serum ferritin (β = .964; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have undergone RYGB, consuming high, but realistic amounts of heme iron in meat, vitamin C from food, and adherence to recommended iron supplements can prevent iron deficiency.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAscorbic AcidBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleGastric BypassHumansIron DeficienciesIron, DietaryMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidProspective Studies
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations14
Citations/Year1.6
Relative Citation Ratio0.67
NIH Percentile36%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.67
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements