Efficacy of Preoperative Progressive Resistance Training on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) combined with postoperative PRT improves functional performance, muscle strength, and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to postoperative PRT alone.
Results Summary
The study found that preoperative PRT significantly improved postoperative functional performance (30sCST, TUG) and muscle strength (knee extensor and flexor) compared to the control group, though no differences were observed in patient-reported outcomes.
Population
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Effective Dosage
Not specified (progressive resistance training regimen details not provided).
Duration
4 weeks preoperative PRT (intervention group) + 4 weeks postoperative PRT (both groups).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 weeks of preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) | increase | 30-second chair stand test (30sCST) | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | 2.5 repetitions [95% CI 0.9, 4.1] versus -1.1 repetitions [95% CI -2.8, 0.7]; P < 0.004 | a significant group difference in favor of the intervention group was found | #1 |
4 weeks of preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) | decrease | timed-up-and-go (TUG) | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | -0.7 seconds [95% CI -1.6, 0.1] versus 0.8 seconds [95% CI -0.1, 1.7]; P = 0.015 | a significant group difference in favor of the intervention group was found | #2 |
4 weeks of preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) | decrease | normalized knee extensor muscle strength | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | -0.2 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.3, -0.1] versus -0.4 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.5, -0.3]; P = 0.002 | a significant group difference in favor of the intervention group was found | #3 |
4 weeks of preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) | increase | normalized knee flexor muscle strength | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | 0.1 Nm/kg [95% CI 0.0, 0.2] versus 0.0 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.1, 0.1]; P = 0.016 | a significant group difference in favor of the intervention group was found | #4 |
4 weeks of preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) | no change | patient-reported outcomes | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | - | No differences were found between groups | #5 |
Supervised preoperative PRT | increase | postoperative functional performance | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | - | is an efficacious and safe intervention for improving | #6 |
Supervised preoperative PRT | increase | muscle strength | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | - | is an efficacious and safe intervention for improving | #7 |
Supervised preoperative PRT | no change | patient-reported outcomes | patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | - | improvements in patient-reported outcomes were not detected | #8 |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of 4 weeks of preoperative and 4 weeks of postoperative progressive resistance training (PRT), compared to 4 weeks of postoperative PRT only on functional performance, muscle strength, and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In total, 59 patients were randomized to 4 weeks of preoperative PRT (intervention group) or to a group who lived as usual (control group). Both groups performed 4 weeks of PRT after TKA. At 6 weeks and 1 week before TKA, and at 1, 6, and 12 weeks after TKA, performance-based measures (30-second chair stand test [30sCST], timed-up-and-go [TUG], and walking tests), knee extensor and flexor muscle strength (dynamometry), patient-reported functional performance, health-related quality of life, and pain scores were evaluated. RESULTS: When comparing the changes from baseline to the primary test point 6 weeks after TKA, a significant group difference in favor of the intervention group was found for the 30sCST (2.5 repetitions [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.9, 4.1] versus -1.1 repetitions [95% CI -2.8, 0.7]; P < 0.004), the TUG (-0.7 seconds [95% CI -1.6, 0.1] versus 0.8 seconds [95% CI -0.1, 1.7]; P = 0.015), normalized knee extensor muscle strength (-0.2 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.3, -0.1] versus -0.4 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.5, -0.3]; P = 0.002), and normalized knee flexor muscle strength (0.1 Nm/kg [95% CI 0.0, 0.2] versus 0.0 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.1, 0.1]; P = 0.016). No differences were found between groups on patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Supervised preoperative PRT is an efficacious and safe intervention for improving postoperative functional performance and muscle strength, but improvements in patient-reported outcomes were not detected.