Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Low-Active Male Adolescents: A Dose Response to High-Intensity Interval Training.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise
March 1, 2016
Greig Robert Melrose Logan et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
8 wk of HIIT
increase
V˙O2peak
low-active male adolescents
∼6%
significant improvements were observed for
#1
8 wk of HIIT
decrease
body fat percentage
low-active male adolescents
∼4%
significant improvements were observed for
#2
8 wk of HIIT
decrease
visceral fat mass
low-active male adolescents
∼10%
significant improvements were observed for
#3
8 wk of HIIT
decrease
waist circumference-to-height ratio
low-active male adolescents
∼3%
significant improvements were observed for
#4
8 wk of HIIT
no change
all health outcomes
low-active male adolescents
no clear effect of dose
there was no clear effect of dose across groups
#5
a single HIIT set twice weekly, in addition to one resistance training session
increase
fitness and body composition
low-active adolescent males
-
gained meaningful improvements in
#6
performing additional HIIT sets
no change
fitness and body composition
low-active adolescent males
no additional improvements
provided no additional improvements to those of the lowest dose
#7
Abstract

PURPOSE: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a potential alternative to traditionally recommended steady state exercise for providing health benefits in adolescents, yet its dose-response relationship in this cohort remains unclear, as does its translatability to real-world, nonclinical settings. The present study adopts a novel dose-response design to investigate the effects of undertaking 8 wk of HIIT on the cardiometabolic health of low-active male adolescents. METHODS: Twenty-six male adolescents (age 16 ± 1 yr), identified as low active by nonparticipation in structured sport and physical education classes, were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups. Corresponding with their group numbers (1-5), participants completed a number of HIIT "sets," which consisted of 4 repeated bouts of 20-s near-maximal exertion interspersed with 10-s passive recovery. Participants performed two HIIT sessions and one resistance training session each week for 8 wk. Baseline and follow-up health measures consisted of peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) with an incremental ramp test to volitional exhaustion; body composition (including visceral fat mass, body fat, and lean tissue mass) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; and lipid profile, glucose, insulin, and interleukin-6 from blood analysis. All health outcomes were analyzed as percentage changes, and data were modeled using a quadratic function to explore dose-response relationships. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed for V˙O2peak (∼6%), body fat percentage (∼4%), visceral fat mass (∼10%), and waist circumference-to-height ratio (∼3%), but there was no clear effect of dose across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-active adolescent males performing a single HIIT set twice weekly, in addition to one resistance training session, gained meaningful improvements in fitness and body composition. Performing additional HIIT sets provided no additional improvements to those of the lowest dose in this study.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Absorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody CompositionHeart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansInsulinInterleukin-6LipidsMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical FitnessResistance Training
Study Links
Citation Metrics
Total Citations40
Citations/Year4.4
Relative Citation Ratio2.42
NIH Percentile79.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75