Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A systematic review of dietary, nutritional, and physical activity interventions for the prevention of prostate cancer progression and mortality.

Cancer causes & control : CCC
November 1, 2015
Lucy E Hackshaw-McGeagh et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReviewSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effects of lifestyle interventions, including a supplement containing Coenzyme Q10, on prostate cancer progression and mortality.

Results Summary

The study found that a trial supplementing soy, lycopene, selenium, and Coenzyme Q10 demonstrated beneficial effects on prostate cancer outcomes, with low risk of bias and high methodological quality.

Population

Prostate cancer patients (3,418 total participants across 44 trials, median 64 men per trial).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
nutritional supplement of pomegranate seed, green tea, broccoli, and turmeric
decrease
prostate cancer progression or mortality
prostate cancer patients
-
demonstrated beneficial effects
#1
flaxseed, low-fat diet, flaxseed, and low-fat diet versus usual diet
decrease
prostate cancer progression or mortality
prostate cancer patients
-
demonstrated beneficial effects
#2
soy, lycopene, selenium, and coenzyme Q10
decrease
prostate cancer progression or mortality
prostate cancer patients
-
demonstrated beneficial effects
#3
Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the long-term, although potentially fatal, nature of prostate cancer, there is increasing observational evidence for the reduction in disease progression and mortality through changes in lifestyle factors. METHODS: We systematically reviewed dietary, nutritional, and physical activity randomized interventions aimed at modifying prostate cancer progression and disease-specific mortality, including a detailed assessment of risk of bias and methodological quality. RESULTS: Forty-four randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions, with prostate cancer progression or mortality outcomes, were identified. Substantial heterogeneity of the data prevented a meta-analysis. The included trials involved 3,418 prostate cancer patients, median 64 men per trial, from 13 countries. A trial of a nutritional supplement of pomegranate seed, green tea, broccoli, and turmeric; a trial comparing flaxseed, low-fat diet, flaxseed, and low-fat diet versus usual diet; and a trial supplementing soy, lycopene, selenium, and coenzyme Q10, all demonstrated beneficial effects. These trials were also assessed as having low risk of bias and high methodological quality (as were seven other trials with no evidence of benefit). The remaining trials were either underpowered, at high or unclear risk of bias, inadequately reported, of short duration or measured surrogate outcomes of unproven relationship to mortality or disease progression, which precluded any benefits reported being reliable. CONCLUSION: Large, well-designed randomized trials with clinical endpoints are recommended for lifestyle modification interventions.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedDietDietary SupplementsDisease ProgressionHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityProstatic Neoplasms
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations58
Citations/Year5.8
Relative Citation Ratio2.37
NIH Percentile79.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score1.95
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements