Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Ergogenic Effects of Caffeine Consumption in a 3-min All-Out Arm Crank Test in Paraplegic and Tetraplegic Compared With Able-Bodied Individuals.

International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism
December 1, 2015
Joelle Leonie Flueck et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate the effect of caffeine supplementation on 3-minute all-out arm crank exercise performance in paraplegic, tetraplegic, and able-bodied participants.

Results Summary

Caffeine significantly increased average power in paraplegic participants but showed no ergogenic effect in tetraplegic participants. Peak power increased in able-bodied and paraplegic participants, though not significantly, while plasma caffeine levels rose in all groups.

Population

34 healthy, trained participants (17 able-bodied, 10 paraplegic, 7 tetraplegic).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Single-dose intervention (two 3-minute tests)

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (16)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
caffeine supplementation
increase
average power over the first 30 s
paraplegic participants
-
significantly increased
#1
caffeine supplementation
increase
average power over the first 60 s
paraplegic participants
-
significantly increased
#2
caffeine supplementation
no change
average power over the first 30 s
tetraplegic participants
-
not increased
#3
caffeine supplementation
no change
average power over the first 60 s
tetraplegic participants
-
not increased
#4
caffeine supplementation
no change
average power over the first 30 s
able-bodied participants
-
not increased
#5
caffeine supplementation
no change
average power over the first 60 s
able-bodied participants
-
not increased
#6
caffeine supplementation
increase
peak power
able-bodied participants
+46 W
increased
#7
caffeine supplementation
increase
peak power
paraplegic participants
+21 W
increased
#8
caffeine supplementation
increase
plasma caffeine concentrations
able-bodied participants
-
significantly increased
#9
caffeine supplementation
increase
plasma caffeine concentrations
paraplegic participants
-
significantly increased
#10
caffeine supplementation
increase
plasma caffeine concentrations
tetraplegic participants
-
significantly increased
#11
caffeine supplementation
increase
epinephrine concentrations
able-bodied participants
-
showed a significant increase
#12
caffeine supplementation
increase
epinephrine concentrations
paraplegic participants
-
showed a significant increase
#13
caffeine supplementation
increase
norepinephrine concentrations
able-bodied participants
-
increased significantly
#14
caffeine supplementation
increase
short-duration exercise performance
paraplegic participants
-
seems to enhance
#15
caffeine supplementation
no change
exercise performance
tetraplegic participants
-
no ergogenic effect was detected
#16
Abstract

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of caffeine supplementation on 3-min all-out arm crank exercise performance in paraplegic (P) and tetraplegic (T) compared with able-bodied (AB) participants. A placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, and double-blind study design was chosen to investigate the differences between caffeine (CAF) and placebo (PLC). In total, 34 healthy, trained participants were tested. Seventeen were AB (median [minimum; maximum] VO2peak: 33.9 mL/min/kg [23.6; 57.6]), 10 were P (VO2peak: 34.4 mL/min/kg [19.5; 48.8]), and 7 were T (VO2peak: 13.6 mL/min/kg [8.6; 16.3]). All participants performed two 3-min all-out tests on an arm crank ergometer following the ingestion of either PLC or CAF. Power output parameters, plasma caffeine (PC), epinephrine (EPI), and norepinephrine (NOR) concentrations were assessed. CAF significantly increased average power over the first 30 s (p = .028) and 60 s (p = .005) in P, but not in T (p = .61; p = .87) nor in AB (p = .25; p = .44). Peak power was increased in the CAF trial in AB (+46 W) as well as in P (+21 W) but was not significantly different from PLC (AB: p = .10; P: p = .17). PC significantly increased in all groups (AB: p = .002; P: p = .005; T: p = .018) whereas EPI showed a significant increase only in AB (p = .002) and in P (p = .018). NOR increased significantly in AB (p = .018) but did not increase in the other groups. Caffeine seems to enhance short-duration exercise performance in P. In contrast, T showed a high interindividual variability and overall no ergogenic effect was detected in this group.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultArmAthletic PerformanceCaffeineCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEpinephrineErgometryExercise TestHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineParaplegiaPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesQuadriplegia
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations7
Citations/Year0.7
Relative Citation Ratio0.48
NIH Percentile25.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.67
Normalized Score0.63
Related Supplements