Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Acupuncture Reduces Pain and Autonomic Distress During Injection of Local Anesthetic in Children: A Pragmatic Crossover Investigation.

The Clinical journal of pain
January 1, 2016
Taras I Usichenko et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticlePragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether stimulation of acupoint LI4 via massage could effectively reduce pain and autonomic distress in children receiving local anesthetic injections during dental procedures.

Results Summary

Patients reported significantly less pain (mean 2.3 vs. 3.9) and lower heart rates when acupuncture with massage was used compared to LA injection alone. The intervention was found to be safe and increased satisfaction levels in both patients and parents.

Population

49 children (22 female; mean age 10 years) scheduled for dental treatment using local anesthetic.

Effective Dosage

Bilateral acupuncture at LI4 with indwelling fixed needles, stimulated by parental massage.

Duration

LA injection given 5 minutes after acupuncture.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
bilateral acupuncture at LI4 using indwelling fixed needles
decrease
pain
children receiving an injection of a local anesthetic (LA)
mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.1) versus 3.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-4.7)
reduces
#1
bilateral acupuncture at LI4 using indwelling fixed needles
decrease
heart rate
children receiving an injection of a local anesthetic (LA)
-
remained low
#2
bilateral acupuncture at LI4 using indwelling fixed needles
increase
satisfaction levels
patients and their parents
-
increased
#3
bilateral acupuncture at LI4 using indwelling fixed needles
decrease
autonomic distress
children during LA injection in dental procedures
-
reduces
#4
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Stimulation of acupoint LI4 has been shown to result in analgesic effects in patients experiencing acute pain. We aimed to study the effectiveness of LI4 stimulation for pain relief in children receiving an injection of a local anesthetic (LA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children scheduled for dental treatment using LA received bilateral acupuncture at LI4 using indwelling fixed needles. During the treatment, the parents of the patients stimulated the needles by massage. Two different treatment regimes were compared: a standardized LA injection given 5 minutes after acupuncture, and an LA injection without acupuncture. The order of treatment was randomized, with the 2 treatments performed in a crossover manner on different days. Pain intensity during LA injection, assessed by the patient with the Verbal Rating Scale or Faces Pain Scale (0 to 10), was used as the primary endpoint. Parent-assessed and dentist-assessed pain intensity and agitation, heart rate, and the patients' satisfaction with the therapy were also recorded. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 49 patients (22 female; mean age 10 y). Patients reported less pain when acupuncture was used: mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.1) versus 3.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-4.7); P<0.001. The patients' heart rate remained low throughout the dental treatment after LI4 stimulation, when compared with treatment without acupuncture (P<0.05). LI4 stimulation was safe and increased satisfaction levels in both the patients and their parents, when compared with LA injection alone (P<0.05). DISCUSSION: Stimulation of acupoint LI4 reduces pain and autonomic distress in children during LA injection in dental procedures.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Acupuncture PointsAcupuncture TherapyAcute PainAdolescentAnesthetics, LocalChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesDental Care for ChildrenFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleNeedlesPain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety90
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations17
Citations/Year1.9
Relative Citation Ratio1.26
NIH Percentile58.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.84
Normalized Score0.86
Related Supplements