Walking training with cueing of cadence improves walking speed and stride length after stroke more than walking training alone: a systematic review.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether walking training with cueing of cadence is more effective than walking training alone in improving walking speed, stride length, cadence, and symmetry in stroke survivors.
Results Summary
The meta-analysis found that walking training with cueing of cadence significantly improved walking speed, stride length, cadence, and symmetry compared to walking training alone, with clinically meaningful effect sizes. The evidence supports recommending this intervention for moderately disabled stroke survivors.
Population
Adults who have had a stroke.
Effective Dosage
30 minutes of cueing of cadence, four times a week.
Duration
4 weeks.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | walking speed | Adults who have had a stroke | 0.23 m/s (95% CI 0.18 to 0.27, I(2)=0%) | improved | #1 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | stride length | Adults who have had a stroke | 0.21 m (95% CI 0.14 to 0.28, I(2)=18%) | improved | #2 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | cadence | Adults who have had a stroke | 19 steps/minute (95% CI 14 to 23, I(2)=40%) | improved | #3 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | symmetry | Adults who have had a stroke | 15% (95% CI 3 to 26, random effects) | improved | #4 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | walking speed | moderately disabled individuals with stroke | - | improves | #5 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | stride length | moderately disabled individuals with stroke | - | improves | #6 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | cadence | moderately disabled individuals with stroke | - | may also produce benefits in terms of | #7 |
Walking training with cueing of cadence | increase | symmetry of walking | moderately disabled individuals with stroke | - | may also produce benefits in terms of | #8 |
QUESTION: After stroke, is walking training with cueing of cadence superior to walking training alone in improving walking speed, stride length, cadence and symmetry? DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised or controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who have had a stroke. INTERVENTION: Walking training with cueing of cadence. OUTCOME MEASURES: Four walking outcomes were of interest: walking speed, stride length, cadence and symmetry. RESULTS: This review included seven trials involving 211 participants. Because one trial caused substantial statistical heterogeneity, meta-analyses were conducted with and without this trial. Walking training with cueing of cadence improved walking speed by 0.23 m/s (95% CI 0.18 to 0.27, I(2)=0%), stride length by 0.21 m (95% CI 0.14 to 0.28, I(2)=18%), cadence by 19 steps/minute (95% CI 14 to 23, I(2)=40%), and symmetry by 15% (95% CI 3 to 26, random effects) more than walking training alone. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence that walking training with cueing of cadence improves walking speed and stride length more than walking training alone. It may also produce benefits in terms of cadence and symmetry of walking. The evidence appears strong enough to recommend the addition of 30 minutes of cueing of cadence to walking training, four times a week for 4 weeks, in order to improve walking in moderately disabled individuals with stroke. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42013005873).