Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effect of early supervised progressive resistance training compared to unsupervised home-based exercise after fast-track total hip replacement applied to patients with preoperative functional limitations. A single-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage
December 1, 2014
L R Mikkelsen et al. (7 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of supervised progressive resistance training (PRT) combined with unsupervised home-based exercise versus unsupervised home-based exercise alone in improving leg-extension power and other functional outcomes in patients after total hip replacement (THR).

Results Summary

Both groups showed improved leg-extension power, with no significant difference between them. However, the intervention group (PRT + home exercise) demonstrated greater improvements in maximal walking speed and stair climb performance compared to the control group (home exercise alone).

Population

Patients with lower pre-operative function scheduled for total hip replacement (THR).

Effective Dosage

Intervention group: 5 days/week home-based exercise + 2 days/week PRT; Control group: 7 days/week home-based exercise.

Duration

10 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
2 weekly sessions of supervised progressive resistance training (PRT) in combination with 5 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise
no change
leg-extension power of the operated leg
patients with lower pre-operative function scheduled for total hip replacement (THR)
no between-group difference (P = 0.79)
was not superior to
#1
2 weekly sessions of supervised progressive resistance training (PRT) in combination with 5 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise
increase
maximal walking speed
patients with lower pre-operative function scheduled for total hip replacement (THR)
P = 0.008
improved more in the IG compared to CG
#2
2 weekly sessions of supervised progressive resistance training (PRT) in combination with 5 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise
increase
stair climb performance
patients with lower pre-operative function scheduled for total hip replacement (THR)
P = 0.04
improved more in the IG compared to CG
#3
2 weekly sessions of supervised progressive resistance training (PRT) in combination with 5 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise
increase
leg extension power
patients with lower pre-operative function scheduled for total hip replacement (THR)
mean [95% CI] IG: 0.29 [0.13; 0.45] W/kg
increased from baseline to the 10 week follow up
#4
7 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise
increase
leg extension power
patients with lower pre-operative function scheduled for total hip replacement (THR)
mean [95% CI] CG: 0.26 [0.10; 0.42] W/kg
increased from baseline to the 10 week follow up
#5
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine if 2 weekly sessions of supervised progressive resistance training (PRT) in combination with 5 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise is more effective than 7 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise in improving leg-extension power of the operated leg 10 weeks after total hip replacement (THR) in patients with lower pre-operative function. METHOD: A total of 73 patients scheduled for THR were randomised (1:1) to intervention group (IG, home based exercise 5 days/week and PRT 2 days/week) or control group (CG, home based exercise 7 days/week). The primary endpoint was change in leg extension power at 10 week follow up. Secondary outcomes were isometric hip muscle strength, sit-to-stand test, stair climb test, 20 m walking speed and patient-reported outcome (HOOS). RESULTS: Sixty-two completed the trial (85%). Leg extension power increased from baseline to the 10 week follow up in both groups; mean [95% CI] IG: 0.29 [0.13; 0.45] and CG: 0.26 [0.10; 0.42] W/kg, with no between-group difference (primary outcome) (P = 0.79). Maximal walking speed (P = 0.008) and stair climb performance (P = 0.04) improved more in the IG compared to CG, no other between-group differences existed. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, supervised PRT twice a week in addition to 5 weekly sessions of unsupervised exercise for 10 weeks was not superior to 7 weekly sessions of unsupervised home-based exercise for 10 weeks in improving the primary outcome, leg-extension power of the operated leg, at the primary endpoint 10 weeks after surgery in THR patients with lower pre-operative function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01214954.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodResistance TrainingSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations44
Citations/Year4.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.42
NIH Percentile79.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.79
Normalized Score0.65
Related Supplements
Effect of early supervised progressive resistance training c... | Panacea Index