Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Evaluation of corneal damage caused by iodine preparations using human corneal epithelial cells.

Japanese journal of ophthalmology
November 1, 2014
Yuuka Shibata et al. (7 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleHuman StudyMolecular Study
Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
povidone-iodine solution (PVP-I)
no change
antiseptic effects
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
equivalent
had equivalent antiseptic effects
#1
povidone-iodine solution (PVP-I) diluted 16-fold
increase
cytotoxicity
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
-
cytotoxicity was higher than
#2
polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution (PAI) diluted 6-fold
decrease
cytotoxicity
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
-
cytotoxicity was lower than
#3
povidone-iodine solution (PVP-I) following inactivation of iodine with sodium thiosulfate
no change
cytotoxicity
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
-
cytotoxicity remained concentration dependent
#4
polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution (PAI) following inactivation of iodine with sodium thiosulfate
no change
toxicity
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
low
exhibited a low toxicity that was similar to the effect of saline
#5
lauromacrogol at concentrations of 1-1000 mg/mL
increase
corneal cytotoxicity
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
-
clearly resulted in corneal cytotoxicity
#6
HCE-T cells at pH 7
increase
cell viability
human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T
significantly more
were significantly more viable than at pH 1-6
#7
Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the cytotoxicity of povidone-iodine solution (PVP-I) with that of polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution (PAI) for ophthalmic use. METHODS: Cells of the human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T were exposed to various dilutions of PVP-I or PAI, and the cytotoxicity of these two antiseptics was evaluated. The relative toxicities of PVP-I and PAI were also investigated following the inactivation of iodine by achromatization with sodium thiosulfate. RESULTS: PVP-I and PAI had equivalent antiseptic effects, but the cytotoxicity of PVP-I diluted 16-fold was higher than that of PAI diluted 6-fold. Following inactivation of iodine with sodium thiosulfate, the cytotoxicity of PVP-I remained concentration dependent, whereas PAI exhibited a low toxicity that was similar to the effect of saline on cell viability. Exposure to lauromacrogol, a surfactant used in PVP-I, in solution at concentrations of 1-1000 mg/mL clearly resulted in corneal cytotoxicity. The PVP-I and PAI solutions had a pH value of 4.0 and 5.2, respectively. HCE-T cells were significantly more viable at pH 7 than at pH 1-6. CONCLUSION: To avoid corneal damage, preoperative antisepsis of the surgical field should be accomplished with PAI diluted 6-fold, rather than with PVP-I diluted 16-fold. The toxicity of the iodine compound stems primarily from the available iodine concentration and partly from its pH, surfactant and osmolality. Further clinical investigations are required in order to determine the optimal concentrations for use.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Anti-Infective Agents, LocalCell CountCell LineCell SurvivalEpithelium, CornealHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOsmotic PressurePolyvinyl AlcoholPovidone-Iodine
Study Links
Citation Metrics
Total Citations30
Citations/Year2.7
Relative Citation Ratio1.58
NIH Percentile66.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Related Supplements