Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Protein supplementation increases postexercise plasma myostatin concentration after 8 weeks of resistance training in young physically active subjects.

Journal of medicinal food
January 1, 2015
Antonio Paoli et al. (13 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate the effects of 2 months of resistance training and different protein diets on plasma myostatin (MSTN) and other biomarkers related to muscle growth and inflammation.

Results Summary

The study found a significant increase in plasma MSTN after resistance training in the high-protein group, which positively correlated with IGF-1 levels. No significant differences were observed between groups for inflammatory markers, muscle mass, or strength, suggesting overlapping effects despite differing protein intakes.

Population

18 healthy volunteers divided into high-protein and normal-protein groups.

Effective Dosage

High-protein group: 1.8 g/kg body weight/day; normal-protein group: 0.85 g/kg body weight/day.

Duration

8 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
2 months of resistance training (RT) and high protein (HP) diet
increase
Plasma MSTN
healthy volunteers (HP group)
P<.001
showed a significant increase
#1
2 months of resistance training (RT) and high protein (HP) diet
increase
IGF-1 plasma concentration with MSTN
healthy volunteers (HP group)
r(2)=0.6456; P=.0295
showed a positive correlation
#2
2 months of resistance training (RT) and normal protein (NP) diet
no change
IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and strength and MM or area
healthy volunteers (NP group vs HP group)
no significant differences
No significant differences were found
#3
2 months of resistance training (RT) and high protein (HP) diet
increase
MSTN elevation with IGF-1 plasma level
-
-
correlates positively
#4
2 months of resistance training (RT) and diets with different protein contents
increase
MM increases
the two groups
-
substantial overlapping
#5
Abstract

Myostatin (MSTN) is a negative regulator of muscle growth even if some studies have shown a counterintuitive positive correlation between MSTN and muscle mass (MM). Our aim was to investigate the influence of 2 months of resistance training (RT) and diets with different protein contents on plasma MSTN, interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Eighteen healthy volunteers were randomly divided in two groups: high protein (HP) and normal protein (NP) groups. Different protein diet contents were 1.8 and 0.85 g of protein·kg bw(-1)·day(-1) for HP and NP, respectively. Subjects underwent 8 weeks of standardized progressive RT. MSTN, IGF-1, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were analyzed before and after the first and the last training sessions. Lean body mass, MM, upper-limb muscle area, and strength were measured. Plasma MSTN showed a significant increase (P<.001) after the last training in the HP group compared with NP group and with starting value. IGF-1 plasma concentration showed a positive correlation with MSTN in HP after the last training (r(2)=0.6456; P=.0295). No significant differences were found between NP and HP for IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and strength and MM or area. These findings suggest a "paradoxical" postexercise increase of plasma MSTN after 8 weeks of RT and HP diets. This MSTN elevation correlates positively with IGF-1 plasma level. This double increase of opposite (catabolic/anabolic) mediators could explain the substantial overlapping of MM increases in the two groups.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultBody CompositionDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsExerciseHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6MaleMuscle, SkeletalMyostatinResistance TrainingTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations14
Citations/Year1.4
Relative Citation Ratio0.68
NIH Percentile36.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.70
Normalized Score0.80
Related Supplements