Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mechanisms behind the superior effects of interval vs continuous training on glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

Diabetologia
October 1, 2014
Kristian Karstoft et al. (9 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of interval walking training (IWT) and continuous walking training (CWT) on glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, and skeletal muscle insulin signalling in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Results Summary

IWT improved glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, peripheral glucose disposal, and disposition index, while CWT and the control group showed no significant changes. IWT also enhanced insulin signalling in skeletal muscle via increased phosphorylation of AS160.

Population

Individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, not on exogenous insulin treatment.

Effective Dosage

Five sessions per week (60 min/session).

Duration

4 months.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (16)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
glycaemic control
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
improved
#1
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
insulin sensitivity index
individuals with type 2 diabetes
49.8 ± 14.6%
increased
#2
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
peripheral glucose disposal
individuals with type 2 diabetes
14.5 ± 4.9%
increased
#3
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
disposition index (DI)
individuals with type 2 diabetes
66.2 ± 21.8%
increased
#4
continuous walking training (CWT)
no change
glycaemic control
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#5
control group (CON)
no change
glycaemic control
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#6
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
insulin signalling in skeletal muscle
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
improved
#7
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of AS160
individuals with type 2 diabetes
29.0 ± 10.8%
increased
#8
interval walking training (IWT)
no change
insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia alone
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#9
interval walking training (IWT)
no change
insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia + glucagon-like peptide 1 infusion
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#10
interval walking training (IWT)
no change
insulin secretion during arginine injection
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#11
interval walking training (IWT)
no change
insulin secretion
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
maintains
#12
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
insulin sensitivity
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
improves
#13
interval walking training (IWT)
increase
disposition index (DI)
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
improves
#14
energy expenditure-matched continuous walking training (CWT)
no change
insulin sensitivity
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#15
energy expenditure-matched continuous walking training (CWT)
no change
disposition index (DI)
individuals with type 2 diabetes
-
no changes
#16
Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: By use of a parallel and partly crossover randomised, controlled trial design we sought to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind the advantageous effects of interval walking training (IWT) compared with continuous walking training (CWT) on glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. We hypothesised that IWT, more than CWT, would improve insulin sensitivity including skeletal muscle insulin signalling, insulin secretion and disposition index (DI). METHODS: By simple randomisation (sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes), eligible individuals (diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, no exogenous insulin treatment) were allocated to three groups: a control group (CON, n = 8), an IWT group (n = 12) and an energy expenditure-matched CWT group (n = 12). Training groups were prescribed free-living training, five sessions per week (60 min/session). A three-stage hyperglycaemic clamp, including glucose isotope tracers and skeletal muscle biopsies, was performed before and after a 4 month intervention in a hospitalised setting. No blinding was performed. RESULTS: The improved glycaemic control, which was only seen in the IWT group, was consistent with IWT-induced increases in insulin sensitivity index (49.8 ± 14.6%; p < 0.001), peripheral glucose disposal (14.5 ± 4.9%; p < 0.05) and DI (66.2 ± 21.8%; p < 0.001), with no changes in the CWT or CON group. Moreover, only IWT improved insulin signalling in skeletal muscle via increased insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of AS160 (29.0 ± 10.8%; p < 0.05). No changes were seen in insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia alone, hyperglycaemia + glucagon-like peptide 1 infusion or arginine injection. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: IWT maintains insulin secretion and improves insulin sensitivity and DI, in contrast to energy expenditure-matched CWT. These results suggest that training with alternating intensity, and not just training volume and mean intensity, is a key determinant of changes in whole body glucose disposal in individuals with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials (NCT01234155).

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Exercise TherapyFemaleHumansInsulinMaleMiddle Aged
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations60
Citations/Year5.5
Relative Citation Ratio2.39
NIH Percentile79.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score1.76
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements
Mechanisms behind the superior effects of interval vs contin... | Panacea Index