Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Impact of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on health care utilization: a population-based controlled comparison.

Journal of psychosomatic research
August 1, 2014
Paul Kurdyak et al. (3 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the impact of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) versus non-MBCT group therapy on reducing non-mental health care utilization among high utilizers of primary care.

Results Summary

MBCT significantly reduced non-mental health care utilization among high utilizers compared to non-MBCT group therapy, with an estimated reduction of 1 non-mental health visit for every two MBCT patients treated. The study suggests MBCT may help reduce distress-related high health care utilization.

Population

High utilizers of primary care in Ontario, Canada, stratified by high/low rates of primary care utilization.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (2)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
decrease
non-mental health care utilization
high utilizers of primary care
0.55 (0.21-0.89)
reduced
#1
Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
decrease
non-mental health utilization
high utilizers
for every two MBCT patients treated, there is a reduction in 1 non-mental health visit
reduction in
#2
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Elevated rates of mood and anxiety disorders among high utilizers of health care have been suggested as one driver of increased service use. We compared the impact of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), a structured group treatment, on the rates of health care utilization with matched control participants receiving non-MBCT group therapy. METHODS: Using Ontario health administrative data, we created a retrospective cohort of population-based patients receiving MBCT and an age- and gender-matched (3:1) cohort of non-MBCT group therapy controls. Subjects were recruited between 2003 and 2010 and stratified according to high/low rates of primary care utilization, with the high utilization cohort being the cohort of interest. The primary outcome was a reduction in an aggregate measure of non-mental health utilization comprising Emergency Department, non-mental health primary care, and non-psychiatrist specialist visits. RESULTS: There were 10,633 MBCT recipients, 4851 (46%) of whom were high utilizers. The proportion of high utilizers was 13,274 (45%, N=29,795) for non-MBCT group therapy controls. Among high utilizers, there was a significant reduction in non-mental health utilization among MBCT recipients compared to non-MBCT group therapy recipients (0.55 (0.21-0.89)) suggesting that for every two MBCT patients treated, there is a reduction in 1 non-mental health visit. CONCLUSION: Among high utilizers of primary care, MBCT reduced non-mental health care utilization 1year post-therapy compared to non-MBCT, group therapy controls. The reductions suggest that MBCT, an established treatment modality for a variety of mental illnesses, has the added benefit of reducing distress-related high health care utilization.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedAnxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMindfulnessMood DisordersOntarioPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality78/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations20
Citations/Year1.8
Relative Citation Ratio0.98
NIH Percentile49.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.60
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements