Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with maintenance anti-depressant treatment depressive relapse/recurrence: the PREVENT trial.

Trials
January 1, 1970
Willem Kuyken et al. (12 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressants (MBCT-TS) is superior to maintenance antidepressants (m-ADM) in preventing depressive relapse/recurrence and improving secondary outcomes like quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

Results Summary

The study suggests MBCT-TS shows potential as an alternative to m-ADM for preventing depressive relapse/recurrence over 24 months, with additional benefits in secondary outcomes. The process studies aim to identify effective components of MBCT to improve therapy and inform theory.

Population

Patients with recurrent major depressive disorder in full or partial remission, recruited through primary care.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

24 months

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
decrease
preventing depressive relapse/recurrence over 24 months
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#1
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
increase
depression free days
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#2
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
decrease
residual depressive symptoms
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#3
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
decrease
antidepressant medication (ADM) usage
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#4
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
decrease
psychiatric and medical co-morbidity
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#5
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
increase
quality of life
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#6
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
increase
cost effectiveness
patients with recurrent depression
-
superior to
#7
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
increase
mindfulness skills
patients with recurrent depression
-
increase in
#8
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS)
neutral
maintenance antidepressants
people with a history of recurrent depression
-
established as an alternative approach to
#9
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is a common and distressing mental health problem that is responsible for significant individual disability and cost to society. Medication and psychological therapies are effective for treating depression and maintenance anti-depressants (m-ADM) can prevent relapse. However, individuals with depression often express a wish for psychological help that can help them recover from depression in the long-term. A recently developed treatment, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), shows potential as a brief group program for people with recurring depression.This trial asks the policy research question; is MBCT with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS) superior to m-ADM in terms of: a primary outcome of preventing depressive relapse/recurrence over 24 months; and secondary outcomes of (a) depression free days, (b) residual depressive symptoms, (c) antidepressant medication (ADM) usage, (d) psychiatric and medical co-morbidity, (e) quality of life, and (f) cost effectiveness? An explanatory research question also asks whether an increase in mindfulness skills is the key mechanism of change.The design is a single-blind, parallel randomized controlled trial examining MBCT-TS versus m-ADM with an embedded process study. To answer the main policy research question the proposed trial compares MBCT-TS with m-ADM for patients with recurrent depression. Four hundred and twenty patients with recurrent major depressive disorder in full or partial remission will be recruited through primary care. RESULTS: Depressive relapse/recurrence over two years is the primary outcome variable. Analyses will be conducted following CONSORT standards and overseen by the trial's Data Monitoring and Safety Committee. Initial analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, with subsequent analyses being per protocol. The explanatory question will be addressed in two mutually informative ways: quantitative measurement of potential mediating variables pre- and post-treatment and a qualitative study of service users' views and experiences. CONCLUSIONS: If the results of our exploratory trial are extended to this definitive trial, MBCT-TS will be established as an alternative approach to maintenance antidepressants for people with a history of recurrent depression. The process studies will provide evidence about the effective components which can be used to improve MBCT and inform theory as well as other therapeutic approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered 7 May 2009; ISRCTN26666654.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Antidepressive AgentsClinical GovernanceCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive Disorder, MajorHumansMindfulnessResearch DesignSecondary PreventionSubstance Withdrawal Syndrome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations9
Citations/Year0.8
Relative Citation Ratio0.40
NIH Percentile21.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.77
Normalized Score0.72
Related Supplements
Update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled tri... | Panacea Index