Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Accessibility and implementation in UK services of an effective depression relapse prevention programme - mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT): ASPIRE study protocol.

Implementation science : IS
January 1, 1970
Jo Rycroft-Malone et al. (8 authors)
Clinical TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the accessibility and implementation barriers of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in the UK and develop a plan to improve its equitable availability.

Results Summary

The study found that MBCT is a cost-effective intervention for recurrent depression but faces uneven implementation across the UK. It seeks to identify barriers and facilitators to improve MBCT's adoption within the NHS.

Population

Stakeholders involved in commissioning, managing, and implementing MBCT services in the UK.

Effective Dosage

Not mentioned

Duration

Not mentioned

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (2)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
decrease
depression recurrence
people with recurrent depression
-
helps people with recurrent depression stay well in the long term
#1
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
increase
cost-effectiveness
people with recurrent depression
-
is a cost-effective psychosocial prevention programme
#2
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a cost-effective psychosocial prevention programme that helps people with recurrent depression stay well in the long term. It was singled out in the 2009 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Depression Guideline as a key priority for implementation. Despite good evidence and guideline recommendations, its roll-out and accessibility across the UK appears to be limited and inequitably distributed. The study aims to describe the current state of MBCT accessibility and implementation across the UK, develop an explanatory framework of what is hindering and facilitating its progress in different areas, and develop an Implementation Plan and related resources to promote better and more equitable availability and use of MBCT within the UK National Health Service. METHODS/DESIGN: This project is a two-phase qualitative, exploratory and explanatory research study, using an interview survey and in-depth case studies theoretically underpinned by the Promoting Action on Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Interviews will be conducted with stakeholders involved in commissioning, managing and implementing MBCT services in each of the four UK countries, and will include areas where MBCT services are being implemented successfully and where implementation is not working well. In-depth case studies will be undertaken on a range of MBCT services to develop a detailed understanding of the barriers and facilitators to implementation. Guided by the study's conceptual framework, data will be synthesized across Phase 1 and Phase 2 to develop a fit for purpose implementation plan. DISCUSSION: Promoting the uptake of evidence-based treatments into routine practice and understanding what influences these processes has the potential to support the adoption and spread of nationally recommended interventions like MBCT. This study could inform a larger scale implementation trial and feed into future implementation of MBCT with other long-term conditions and associated co-morbidities. It could also inform the implementation of interventions that are acceptable and effective, but are not widely accessible or implemented.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansChronic DiseaseClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive DisorderInterviews as TopicPatient ParticipationRecurrenceResearch DesignUnited KingdomMindfulness
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year0.9
Relative Citation Ratio0.56
NIH Percentile30.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.65
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements